IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / correct outcome?
Post #18,287
by Silverlock
11/14/01 3:08:49 PM
Reply
New correct outcome?
That would imply the rules were followed. In a state renowned for its corruption, institutional racism and political cronyism. Remotely possible I suppose. Highly unlikely though.
How to mangle the truth;

Have it reported by any major U.S. media outlet.
Post #18,293
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
11/14/01 3:30:29 PM
Reply
New All reports..
...that have followed the guidelines and procedures set forth by the FL SC and counted the disputed ballots that were ordered recounted have all come to the same conclusion...Bush won.

Now..if you want to start questioning the way the rules were applied...and the >rightness< of the rules in play...go ahead...I don't think you'll get any argument from me.

You would get an argument from me, however, if you claim that its only screwed up in Florida or if it was only the Republicans that tapdanced along that fine line.


You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #18,300
by Silverlock
11/14/01 4:21:54 PM
Reply
New Debatable that the rules were followed.
But not worth the effort. We have a legally appointed president who would have been elected and is not the choice of the electorate. I can live with that and hope he is voted out come next election. A much larger hope is that a candidate is offered who is remotely worthy of being elected.
How to mangle the truth;

Have it reported by any major U.S. media outlet.
Post #18,304
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
11/14/01 4:40:00 PM
Reply
New Amen brutha!
A much larger hope is that a candidate is offered who is remotely worthy of being elected.


On that we agree.

You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #18,376
by boxley
11/14/01 11:23:07 PM
Reply
New Ventura or Knowles, but they wont run
tshirt front "born to die before I get old"
thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"
     Bush would have won anyway - (bluke) - (45) - Nov. 12, 2001, 05:54:44 AM EST
         20/20 hindsight. The deed was done in ignorance and fear - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2001, 06:27:31 AM EST
         Read further and you will see... - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 12, 2001, 09:27:39 AM EST
         You'll notice... - (bepatient) - (33) - Nov. 12, 2001, 10:36:16 AM EST
             re: By the standards set. - (Silverlock) - Nov. 12, 2001, 11:35:27 AM EST
             You still don't get it, do you? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (30) - Nov. 12, 2001, 03:18:31 PM EST
                 Sure I do... - (bepatient) - (29) - Nov. 12, 2001, 08:37:47 PM EST
                     Don't think I'm missing anything. - (mmoffitt) - (28) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:13:55 AM EST
                         Mega dittoes, Rush. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2001, 10:43:03 AM EST
                             Rush? S.O.B. is as far as I go with a joke! -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 13, 2001, 11:04:45 AM EST
                         Sure you are... - (bepatient) - (25) - Nov. 13, 2001, 12:41:06 PM EST
                             So only *some* of the votes should have been counted, right? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (24) - Nov. 13, 2001, 02:51:40 PM EST
                                 The ones that the FL SC said to count...correct. - (bepatient) - (23) - Nov. 13, 2001, 03:26:49 PM EST
                                     At last! We see the difference between us. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Nov. 13, 2001, 03:45:38 PM EST
                                         Wrong... - (bepatient) - (21) - Nov. 13, 2001, 04:42:31 PM EST
                                             So then - if an AG is behaving in a patently biased way - (Ashton) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:00:57 PM EST
                                             Just wondering - (JayMehaffey) - (11) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:38:08 PM EST
                                                 you mean the demomob stopping military counts? :) - (boxley) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2001, 10:00:48 PM EST
                                                     That was the flaw, they (or Gore) didn't stop them. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2001, 09:49:07 AM EST
                                                         Regardless. - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 14, 2001, 10:28:26 AM EST
                                                             You're right - (Silverlock) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2001, 11:40:41 AM EST
                                                                 In this case... - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:01:04 PM EST
                                                                     correct outcome? - (Silverlock) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:08:49 PM EST
                                                                         All reports.. - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:30:29 PM EST
                                                                             Debatable that the rules were followed. - (Silverlock) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:21:54 PM EST
                                                                                 Amen brutha! - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:40:00 PM EST
                                                                                     Ventura or Knowles, but they wont run -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2001, 11:23:07 PM EST
                                                             In Summary. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 18, 2001, 08:22:08 PM EST
                                             Nope. I only object to selective enforcement. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2001, 09:50:59 AM EST
                                                 yup and the law says overcounted ballots must be thrown out - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2001, 12:05:04 PM EST
                                                     :-) -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:01:48 PM EST
                                                     Of course, the law also states... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:29:04 PM EST
                                                         And the ruling on the field was? -NT - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:39:06 PM EST
                                                             (IIRC) The appeals court overturned the law. - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:58:25 PM EST
                                                                 postmarks were required by fl law not by federal at time -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 11:21:57 PM EST
                                                                     True..but believe it or not... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 15, 2001, 10:50:00 AM EST
             Related logic: "I saw Bigfoot once". -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2001, 06:48:45 PM EST
         Even though more people voted for Gore. - (Silverlock) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:01:38 PM EST
             I don't think that point is ignored. - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:04:16 PM EST
                 Irrelevant? The twisting of rules denies peoples choice - (Silverlock) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:17:37 PM EST
                     You should know how to respond... - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:48:36 PM EST
                 Ah, but it was the precident - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:25:57 PM EST
             But who else but the partisans can act in the courts? - (Another Scott) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:36:24 PM EST
         So the USSC cost Bush the election - (mhuber) - (2) - Nov. 16, 2001, 02:16:42 AM EST
             Maybe the only obvious 'truth' to emerge yet! -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 16, 2001, 06:04:43 AM EST
             Well....yeah, put that way... -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 16, 2001, 07:43:50 AM EST

... and then the Earth cooled.
454 ms