Anyone else in his mode I wouldn't name today either - because they aren't runnable with voters like me.
As you may have noticed, there are enough voters who aren't like me that they are runnable...
Cheers,
Ben
The Democratic Party has proved once again . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (19)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 10:13:43 AM EST
Well, look to Illinois
- (jb4)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 12:46:42 PM EST
Thanks
- (bepatient)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 01:30:24 PM EST
na, skank in 4
- (daemon)
- (9)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 05:06:13 PM EST
8 years ago I wouldn't have named George Bush
- (ben_tilly)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 06:07:07 PM EST
Hillary will never run for pres
- (Silverlock)
- (7)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 10:01:41 PM EST
Sad thing is
- (JayMehaffey)
- (2)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 10:29:49 PM EST
Even sadder
- (drewk)
- (1)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 10:35:49 PM EST
Truth.
- (admin)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 10:36:31 PM EST
And the winner is.....
- (ChrisR)
- (3)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 11:08:46 AM EST
Has nothing to do with the 22nd Amendment
- (jb4)
- (2)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 12:46:16 PM EST
Jeb can though
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 01:45:07 PM EST
Wow! I didn't know he knew VBA!
- (jb4)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 01:46:10 PM EST
The two-party system is self-healing.
- (marlowe)
- (6)
- Nov. 3, 2004, 08:02:30 PM EST
RE: Sig
- (tuberculosis)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 12:41:20 AM EST
d00d...where are you coming from?
- (Simon_Jester)
- (4)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 09:49:57 AM EST
No kidding...
- (admin)
- (3)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 10:10:35 AM EST
Unfortunately
- (lincoln)
- (2)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 04:32:02 PM EST
That's the word of the day.
- (admin)
- (1)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 04:43:57 PM EST
Yeh, and Gore had mandate in 2000! :)
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- Nov. 4, 2004, 05:39:40 PM EST