The problem was *Windows* XP, not Office XP.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #18,213 by CRConrad 11/14/01 6:48:15 AM Reply	The problem was Windows XP, not Office XP.
Post #18,276 by altmann 11/14/01 1:52:59 PM Reply	Sorry, its hard keeping all the XPs straight Even thought it said Windows XP right there in the main post. :/ -- Chris Altmann
Post #18,342 by CRConrad 11/14/01 8:11:41 PM Reply	Who knows, that's probably intentional...

InfoWorld:XP as bad as half as fast as 2K under heavy load. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Nov. 2, 2001, 02:06:43 PM EST

There's a simple explanation, apparently - (Ashton) - Nov. 2, 2001, 08:48:34 PM EST

Dual-proc or 2GHz+ boxes recommended for MS Office? - (bbronson) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:32:35 PM EST

That's really his only option. - (static) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:36:12 PM EST

Not that bad IME - (altmann) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 01:27:44 AM EST

The problem was *Windows* XP, not Office XP. -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2001, 06:48:15 AM EST

Sorry, its hard keeping all the XPs straight - (altmann) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 01:52:59 PM EST

Who knows, that's probably intentional... -NT - (CRConrad) - Nov. 14, 2001, 08:11:41 PM EST

Last night my friend asked to use a USB port to charge his cigarette, but I was using it to charge my book. The future is stupid.
40 ms