Yes and no
These classes do provide important functionality that was not there. The problem is that it doesn't tie well into the existing Java classes. The following quote illustrates this: [link|http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2001/jw-0907-merlin.html|Master Merlin's new I/O classes]
"On the other hand, the new I/O doesn't integrate well with the old I/O. (And when exactly will it stop being new? Will Sun rename the packages when the next, newer I/O capability comes along?) In particular, the Buffers don't connect well with existing java.io classes. Just try explaining that BufferedReader can't read into Buffers and you can't pass a Buffer to BufferedWriter! The JCP operates by chartering an expert group (a committee) to address each specification request. These expert groups work independently, each with a relatively narrow charter. It is hardly surprising that there is little interaction between feature sets, or that new features do not reach broadly into the existing APIs. "
Unfortunatley this is what happens when you design a language by committees.