IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re Re Wind
And the crowd said, "Bo Selecta".

You're talking nonsense. Because you upgrade with an automated tool that is guaranteed to not remove superfluous libraries, you're pretty much guaranteed to end up with stale, unused libraries on your system.

How do you GUARANTEE that such a such a situation does not occur in your oh-so-tight system?

Oh, balls to this.

You can't. That's it; it's that simple. There's no tool for doing this on RPM-based Linux distributions. It's down to you going "rpm -qa", parsing the results, and figuring it out for yourself.

On the other hand, there is a tool for doing this on Debian-based distributions; it's called "deborphan" and it removes libraries and packages (as you see fit, natch) that nothing depends on.

In fact, in order to ensure that one's system remains "tight" (whatever the hell that means - on the one hand, you're spectacularly anal about what kernel modules are available, on the other you don't appear to give a shit what's strewn about the filesystem) there's an even better tool - "debfoster". debfoster removes packages and everything that they and they alone depend on. I'd have thought such things would appeal to your silly sense of "tightness", but now that you've backed yourself into the "Debian is shit! I think it, therefore it's true!" corner, you'll never be able to use them (at least, and admit it).


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Ok, that's nice
Why can't I download that and run it on my machine? Sounds pretty standalone.

Remember "repeats.com" for DOS?
-drl
New Good luck with that.
Knock yourself out:

[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org/code/|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org/code/]

It won't work out of the box, though. You need dpkg.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Can I alter it for RPM?
-drl
New I dunno. Can you?
It's GPL software, if that's what you're asking.

Making it work with RPM-based systems is a Small Matter Of Programming.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
     which distro should I use - (daemon) - (91)
         Debian, duh :-) -NT - (pwhysall) - (3)
             No Mandrake Susie? -NT - (daemon) - (2)
                 I used to use Mandrake. - (bepatient) - (1)
                     Ill try both -NT - (daemon)
         128k? Really? Wow. -NT - (drewk) - (5)
             Time for a RAM disk! -NT - (admin)
             K M wtf difference :-) -NT - (daemon)
             He's sorry he doesn't have 768 GB like Joe. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 You have an entirely too comprehensive... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Some things stick in my head, lots and lots doesn't. -NT - (Another Scott)
         Ummm, my standard answer. - (folkert)
         That was a doofus question... - (hnick) - (12)
             Are you saying that Debian is a religion? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (11)
                 'round here it is... -NT - (hnick)
                 Re: Are you saying that Debian is a religion? - (daemon) - (6)
                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk)
                     That's a good summary of the state of proprietary software - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                         hmm I thought debian was an operating system :-) -NT - (daemon) - (3)
                             No, it is more than an OS. - (folkert) - (2)
                                 Bullshit -NT - (deSitter) - (1)
                                     Okay, another... - (folkert)
                 Yes, I would. I believe it is. - (folkert) - (2)
                     I barf in your fans -NT - (deSitter) - (1)
                         Take a minute - (folkert)
         SuSE - (deSitter) - (21)
             Trevor? thats fsckin out then -NT - (daemon)
             What are you a Troll? (new thread) - (folkert)
             Well, I'll give you partial credit - (folkert) - (8)
                 To infinity and beyond! - (deSitter) - (7)
                     Quaint. But fetid in taste. -NT - (folkert)
                     You know nothing but still mock it? - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                         never stopped anyone before :-) -NT - (daemon)
                         Debbiean I knew - I don't watch cartoons - (deSitter) - (3)
                             Care to define "success"? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                 Yes - dollars, pervasiveness, and trust - (deSitter) - (1)
                                     Well in the server category... - (ben_tilly)
             You've got a nerve. (new thread) - (pwhysall)
             Actually I agree - (drewk) - (8)
                 Not to mention - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Thanks, my google-fu was lacking -NT - (drewk)
                 Stupidity is boundless -NT - (deSitter)
                 Best Version Ever - (pwhysall)
                 Have you tried buying one of those by name? - (a6l6e6x) - (3)
                     Have you ever tried to buy Woody? - (drewk) - (2)
                         I get offers to buy Woody in my Inbox every day... :/ -NT - (FuManChu)
                         Point: Don't use or complain about the Woody name. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         I'll take a contrarian view - (broomberg) - (44)
             why not recompile the kernel? - (daemon) - (43)
                 Nothing to do with sacrosanct - (broomberg) - (42)
                     Re: Nothing to do with sacrosanct - (daemon) - (2)
                         What the hell is that supposed to mean? - (broomberg) - (1)
                             Re: What the hell is that supposed to mean? - (daemon)
                     absurd - (deSitter) - (38)
                         Ahh, so maybe I get to learn something - (broomberg) - (2)
                             Ok, sorry out of line to say "absurd" - (deSitter) - (1)
                                 You mean that he's the ONLY one? - (ben_tilly)
                         What's the cost-benefit analysis of such an exercise? - (pwhysall) - (34)
                             Re: What's the cost-benefit analysis of such an exercise? - (deSitter) - (33)
                                 Feel free to answer the question. - (pwhysall) - (32)
                                     It's an attitude - (deSitter) - (31)
                                         Answer the question. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                         As the duly appointed business "Linux" person - (broomberg) - (29)
                                             Re: As the duly appointed business "Linux" person - (deSitter) - (28)
                                                 Stale libs? - (pwhysall) - (27)
                                                     Be more specific - (deSitter) - (26)
                                                         Scenario: You update using YaST. - (pwhysall) - (25)
                                                             ? SuSE is RPM based - (deSitter) - (24)
                                                                 Answer the question. - (pwhysall)
                                                                 Not what he is asking. - (folkert) - (22)
                                                                     Re: Not what he is asking. - (deSitter) - (21)
                                                                         You are missing the POINT! - (folkert) - (20)
                                                                             So? - (deSitter) - (19)
                                                                                 Unless I'm missing something...... - (n3jja) - (18)
                                                                                     Re: Unless I'm missing something...... - (daemon) - (1)
                                                                                         Did you read - (folkert)
                                                                                     Re: Unless I'm missing something...... - (deSitter) - (15)
                                                                                         Re Re Wind - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                                             Ok, that's nice - (deSitter) - (3)
                                                                                                 Good luck with that. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                                                                     Can I alter it for RPM? -NT - (deSitter) - (1)
                                                                                                         I dunno. Can you? - (pwhysall)
                                                                                         BTW.... - (folkert) - (6)
                                                                                             Always wondered: is the "L" silent as in "folk"? Guessing no -NT - (FuManChu) - (1)
                                                                                                 As in: - (folkert)
                                                                                             Re: BTW.... - (deSitter) - (3)
                                                                                                 His so pissy what? - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                                                                     HEY!! - (n3jja) - (1)
                                                                                                         Yeah, you pasty skinned photon trap! -NT - (deSitter)
                                                                                         Okay then... another thing - (folkert) - (2)
                                                                                             Re: Okay then... another thing - (deSitter) - (1)
                                                                                                 Eaxctly the point I was trying to make. - (folkert)

HA! THAT DON'T PAY THE RENT!
85 ms