Post #178,338
10/7/04 8:32:19 PM
|

Well *that* wasn't what I intended
I raided the second nic out of the old box and put it in the new. Plugged the crossover from the (transplanted) second nic into the remaining nic on the old box. Booted, I had no network on the new box. eth0 didn't get a dhcp offer.
The just-installed spare nic took over eth0, and I now can't find the original nic.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #178,352
10/7/04 10:16:31 PM
|

Re: Well *that* wasn't what I intended
Im confused, you had 2 nics on old, one on new, moved second nic from old to new (assume you took the box down to do this because without a keyboard most bios dont boot, a different issue of course) old nic is now 2nd nic on new eth0 binds to oldnew nic with crossover cable (cant find neworiginal) is the neworiginal nic have a lan cable shoved up its arse? if not the oldnew has a link and so grabs eth0 position? routing? what is pointing at newnew lan route and not applicable to oldnew? regards, daemon
|
Post #178,376
10/7/04 11:49:16 PM
|

Lemme try again
Old box has nic A as eth0 and nic B as eth1.
New box has nic C as eth0.
I remove nic B from old box and put it in new box.
Boot new box and it calls nic B eth0, and I can't get it to recognize that nic C is still there. Doesn't matter what cable I plug into what nic.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #178,535
10/8/04 8:40:29 PM
|

Re: Lemme try again
Okay, but why do you need 2 nics if you have a crossover cable? plug, put 2 ajacent ip addresses on both boxes and go? regards, daemon
|
Post #178,539
10/8/04 9:22:08 PM
|

That's not why I did swapped the nics
I'm going to be selling the old box to my father-in-law. He won't have any need for two nics. I might, so I'm keeping the spare. The issue of not being able to find the primary nic on the new box is completely separate from the issue of transferring the files.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #178,540
10/8/04 9:27:50 PM
|

ROFL, yard it out until after the xfer :-)
|
Post #178,542
10/8/04 9:33:49 PM
|

Usually I speak ***lish, but that one has me stumped
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #178,546
10/8/04 9:38:50 PM
|

Re: Usually I speak ***lish, but that one has me stumped
If you are only removing the second nic as to deprive the relative of its use, why put in in the box you are keeping until after all other chores (file xfr etc) is done? actually boxlish is fine, I am just avoiding a cursorary inspection regards,
|
Post #178,583
10/9/04 12:28:38 AM
|

Got it, that was my plan for tomorrow
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|