IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New How to boot headless using a crossover
I've got to move files from the old box to the new one. I've got a crossover, but only one monitor and keyboard. I know I should be able to boot the old one headless, connected with a crossover, but I don't know how to get the new one to recognize it. Or rather, I don't know how to get the old one to recognize the connection if I haven't already configured it, or how to configure it headless before it connects.

Is this one of those things that I just plug it all in and it works? Asking before I try, because I'll have to unplug the modem to free up the network card to do this.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Well *that* wasn't what I intended
I raided the second nic out of the old box and put it in the new. Plugged the crossover from the (transplanted) second nic into the remaining nic on the old box. Booted, I had no network on the new box. eth0 didn't get a dhcp offer.

The just-installed spare nic took over eth0, and I now can't find the original nic.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Re: Well *that* wasn't what I intended
Im confused, you had 2 nics on old, one on new, moved second nic from old to new (assume you took the box down to do this because without a keyboard most bios dont boot, a different issue of course) old nic is now 2nd nic on new eth0 binds to oldnew nic with crossover cable (cant find neworiginal)
is the neworiginal nic have a lan cable shoved up its arse?
if not the oldnew has a link and so grabs eth0 position?
routing? what is pointing at newnew lan route and not applicable to oldnew?
regards,
daemon
New Lemme try again
Old box has nic A as eth0 and nic B as eth1.

New box has nic C as eth0.

I remove nic B from old box and put it in new box.

Boot new box and it calls nic B eth0, and I can't get it to recognize that nic C is still there. Doesn't matter what cable I plug into what nic.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Re: Lemme try again
Okay, but why do you need 2 nics if you have a crossover cable?
plug, put 2 ajacent ip addresses on both boxes and go?
regards,
daemon
New That's not why I did swapped the nics
I'm going to be selling the old box to my father-in-law. He won't have any need for two nics. I might, so I'm keeping the spare. The issue of not being able to find the primary nic on the new box is completely separate from the issue of transferring the files.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New ROFL, yard it out until after the xfer :-)
New Usually I speak ***lish, but that one has me stumped
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Re: Usually I speak ***lish, but that one has me stumped
If you are only removing the second nic as to deprive the relative of its use, why put in in the box you are keeping until after all other chores (file xfr etc) is done? actually boxlish is fine, I am just avoiding a cursorary inspection
regards,
New Got it, that was my plan for tomorrow
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Re: How to boot headless using a crossover
Null modem, serial to serial, enable serial console support in kernel, set the serial line to 9600,8,n,1 or learn how to pass 38000,8,n,1 on boot. No headless necessary.
-drl
New Don't have a nullmodem, have a cat5 crossover
Besides, I'm trying to do this without hvaing to unplug everything and hook the monitor and keyboard back up to the old one. If I have to configure that one first I will, but I'm asking if there's a way to do this without configuring it first.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Re: Don't have a nullmodem, have a cat5 crossover
The modem is for the console, not the network!

You boot headless to the serial console. It's a thing of beauty to watch Linux boot on a VT320. It's almost as good to watch it boot in minicom or Windows telnet :)

It's trivial to make a null modem.

(Speaking of modem - you should be able to connect a modem to another modem and get a serial connection, though I've never tried it and you'd have to issue the appropriate AT commands to program the modem state.)
-drl
Expand Edited by deSitter Oct. 7, 2004, 10:51:48 PM EDT
New I don't have a serial console
Or a modem. Or a nullmodem. I'm not going to buy more hardware just to do a one-time data dump. If I can't connect these boxes together through the nics, I'll just boot the old one, tar up what I need, dump it in my yahoo or google accounts, then boot the new machine and grab it. New hardware and making cables is ridiculous.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Just remember...
...if your BIOS doesn't support a serial terminal (like pretty much any PC BIOS out there) you'll only pick up the action when getty starts.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
     How to boot headless using a crossover - (drewk) - (14)
         Well *that* wasn't what I intended - (drewk) - (8)
             Re: Well *that* wasn't what I intended - (daemon) - (7)
                 Lemme try again - (drewk) - (6)
                     Re: Lemme try again - (daemon) - (5)
                         That's not why I did swapped the nics - (drewk) - (4)
                             ROFL, yard it out until after the xfer :-) -NT - (daemon) - (3)
                                 Usually I speak ***lish, but that one has me stumped -NT - (drewk) - (2)
                                     Re: Usually I speak ***lish, but that one has me stumped - (daemon) - (1)
                                         Got it, that was my plan for tomorrow -NT - (drewk)
         Re: How to boot headless using a crossover - (deSitter) - (4)
             Don't have a nullmodem, have a cat5 crossover - (drewk) - (3)
                 Re: Don't have a nullmodem, have a cat5 crossover - (deSitter) - (2)
                     I don't have a serial console - (drewk)
                     Just remember... - (pwhysall)

As Ashton noted, it's a good one.
79 ms