ICLRPD (new thread)

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 2 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #178,076

by drewk

10/6/04 7:36:34 PM

ICLRPD (new thread)

Created as new thread #178075 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=178075|ICLRPD]

===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.

which distro should I use - (daemon) - (91) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:05:06 PM EDT

Debian, duh :-) -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:06:33 PM EDT

No Mandrake Susie? -NT - (daemon) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:13:50 PM EDT

I used to use Mandrake. - (bepatient) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:21:59 PM EDT

Ill try both -NT - (daemon) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:52:35 PM EDT

128k? Really? Wow. -NT - (drewk) - (5) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:08:11 PM EDT

Time for a RAM disk! -NT - (admin) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:09:12 PM EDT

K M wtf difference :-) -NT - (daemon) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:12:08 PM EDT

He's sorry he doesn't have 768 GB like Joe. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:12:11 PM EDT

You have an entirely too comprehensive... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:13:05 PM EDT

Some things stick in my head, lots and lots doesn't. -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:14:37 PM EDT

Ummm, my standard answer. - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:26:10 PM EDT

That was a doofus question... - (hnick) - (12) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:41:55 PM EDT

Are you saying that Debian is a religion? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:49:38 PM EDT

'round here it is... -NT - (hnick) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:54:14 PM EDT

Re: Are you saying that Debian is a religion? - (daemon) - (6) - Oct. 6, 2004, 07:28:36 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - Oct. 6, 2004, 07:36:34 PM EDT

That's a good summary of the state of proprietary software - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Oct. 6, 2004, 07:59:26 PM EDT

hmm I thought debian was an operating system :-) -NT - (daemon) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:01:24 PM EDT

No, it is more than an OS. - (folkert) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:07:15 PM EDT

Bullshit -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:17:58 PM EDT

Okay, another... - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:29:51 PM EDT

Yes, I would. I believe it is. - (folkert) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:05:34 PM EDT

I barf in your fans -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:17:45 PM EDT

Take a minute - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:28:36 PM EDT

SuSE - (deSitter) - (21) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:12:17 PM EDT

Trevor? thats fsckin out then -NT - (daemon) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:17:38 PM EDT

What are you a Troll? (new thread) - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:20:34 PM EDT

Well, I'll give you partial credit - (folkert) - (8) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:26:23 PM EDT

To infinity and beyond! - (deSitter) - (7) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:35:03 PM EDT

Quaint. But fetid in taste. -NT - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:40:32 PM EDT

You know nothing but still mock it? - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:20:23 PM EDT

never stopped anyone before :-) -NT - (daemon) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:21:35 PM EDT

Debbiean I knew - I don't watch cartoons - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:25:07 PM EDT

Care to define "success"? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:38:57 PM EDT

Yes - dollars, pervasiveness, and trust - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2004, 03:56:57 AM EDT

Well in the server category... - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 7, 2004, 11:09:24 AM EDT

You've got a nerve. (new thread) - (pwhysall) - Oct. 7, 2004, 01:59:31 AM EDT

Actually I agree - (drewk) - (8) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:40:12 AM EDT

Not to mention - (pwhysall) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:45:46 AM EDT

Thanks, my google-fu was lacking -NT - (drewk) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:56:14 AM EDT

Stupidity is boundless -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:50:57 AM EDT

Best Version Ever - (pwhysall) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:52:30 AM EDT

Have you tried buying one of those by name? - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:45:26 AM EDT

Have you ever tried to buy Woody? - (drewk) - (2) - Oct. 7, 2004, 11:01:01 AM EDT

I get offers to buy Woody in my Inbox every day... :/ -NT - (FuManChu) - Oct. 7, 2004, 11:09:43 AM EDT

Point: Don't use or complain about the Woody name. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Oct. 7, 2004, 11:22:48 AM EDT

I'll take a contrarian view - (broomberg) - (44) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:50:41 PM EDT

why not recompile the kernel? - (daemon) - (43) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:05:00 PM EDT

Nothing to do with sacrosanct - (broomberg) - (42) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:12:27 PM EDT

Re: Nothing to do with sacrosanct - (daemon) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:20:16 PM EDT

What the hell is that supposed to mean? - (broomberg) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:37:52 PM EDT

Re: What the hell is that supposed to mean? - (daemon) - Oct. 7, 2004, 06:20:06 PM EDT

absurd - (deSitter) - (38) - Oct. 7, 2004, 03:26:59 AM EDT

Ahh, so maybe I get to learn something - (broomberg) - (2) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:08:24 AM EDT

Ok, sorry out of line to say "absurd" - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:24:14 AM EDT

You mean that he's the ONLY one? - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 7, 2004, 11:24:34 AM EDT

What's the cost-benefit analysis of such an exercise? - (pwhysall) - (34) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:11:50 AM EDT

Re: What's the cost-benefit analysis of such an exercise? - (deSitter) - (33) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:26:43 AM EDT

Feel free to answer the question. - (pwhysall) - (32) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:28:18 AM EDT

It's an attitude - (deSitter) - (31) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:36:08 AM EDT

Answer the question. -NT - (pwhysall) - Oct. 7, 2004, 08:38:42 AM EDT

As the duly appointed business "Linux" person - (broomberg) - (29) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:05:41 AM EDT

Re: As the duly appointed business "Linux" person - (deSitter) - (28) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:23:53 AM EDT

Stale libs? - (pwhysall) - (27) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:24:43 AM EDT

Be more specific - (deSitter) - (26) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:27:08 AM EDT

Scenario: You update using YaST. - (pwhysall) - (25) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:31:16 AM EDT

? SuSE is RPM based - (deSitter) - (24) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:08:56 AM EDT

Answer the question. - (pwhysall) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:14:28 AM EDT

Not what he is asking. - (folkert) - (22) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:14:33 AM EDT

Re: Not what he is asking. - (deSitter) - (21) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:36:02 AM EDT

You are missing the POINT! - (folkert) - (20) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:57:08 AM EDT

So? - (deSitter) - (19) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:05:43 PM EDT

Unless I'm missing something...... - (n3jja) - (18) - Oct. 7, 2004, 09:29:44 PM EDT

Re: Unless I'm missing something...... - (daemon) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:26:21 PM EDT

Did you read - (folkert) - Oct. 8, 2004, 09:55:30 AM EDT

Re: Unless I'm missing something...... - (deSitter) - (15) - Oct. 7, 2004, 10:47:15 PM EDT

Re Re Wind - (pwhysall) - (4) - Oct. 8, 2004, 03:23:23 AM EDT

Ok, that's nice - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 8, 2004, 06:11:54 AM EDT

Good luck with that. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Oct. 8, 2004, 07:37:50 AM EDT

Can I alter it for RPM? -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2004, 08:26:30 AM EDT

I dunno. Can you? - (pwhysall) - Oct. 8, 2004, 08:47:45 AM EDT

BTW.... - (folkert) - (6) - Oct. 8, 2004, 09:28:44 AM EDT

Always wondered: is the "L" silent as in "folk"? Guessing no -NT - (FuManChu) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2004, 11:23:38 AM EDT

As in: - (folkert) - Oct. 8, 2004, 12:12:27 PM EDT

Re: BTW.... - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 8, 2004, 12:54:31 PM EDT

His so pissy what? - (pwhysall) - (2) - Oct. 8, 2004, 02:47:32 PM EDT

HEY!! - (n3jja) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2004, 07:00:06 PM EDT

Yeah, you pasty skinned photon trap! -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2004, 11:28:06 PM EDT

Okay then... another thing - (folkert) - (2) - Oct. 8, 2004, 09:37:29 AM EDT

Re: Okay then... another thing - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2004, 09:38:40 AM EDT

Eaxctly the point I was trying to make. - (folkert) - Oct. 8, 2004, 09:49:01 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Microphone check, microphone check. Can I get a check-up from the neck up?
130 ms