The zombie thread is back!

Post #177,546 by Another Scott 10/3/04 2:01:57 PM Reply	The zombie thread is back! Thanks! I'm glad I didn't resurrect it. But I'm glad that I can pile on now. :-D Have you folks seen [link\|http://imrl.usu.edu/bush_memo_study/index.htm\|this]? A professor at Utah State University has written that he thinks there's nothing in the typesetting in the CBS memos that proves they're fake. I find his analysis less than convincing, but there you are. (Note that he only evaluated the typeface.) I found it on Dan Gillmor's [link\|http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/archives/010840.shtml\|blog]. Cheers, Scott.
Post #177,548 by pwhysall 10/3/04 2:06:51 PM Reply	I HATE BLOGS. Thank you. That is all. "You are all pretentious twats." Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #177,550 by Another Scott 10/3/04 2:12:35 PM Reply	Blogs R The Future! Unfortunately. I really wish the SJMN would use some better software. Reading unthreaded comments is such a drag. Cheers, Scott.
Post #177,551 by deSitter 10/3/04 2:17:56 PM Reply	Re: The zombie thread is back! Yes, it's interesting because as I once said, the font is not exactly TNR on Windows - but could be Adobe TR or the like - the author insists on "Typewriter". He points out that the elevation of the "th" is completely different, something I noticed immediately. There just isn't enough information to decide based on the font alone. -drl

Welcome to IWETHEY!