Not bad for ~ 90 mph.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #176,625 by Another Scott 9/27/04 7:51:09 PM Reply	Not bad for ~ 90 mph. And he's probably used to getting 10 mpg with his van. ;-) Cheers, Scott. (Who's still happy with his [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=124780\|TDI] that has given 52 mpg at 60 mph on a 330 mile trip.)
Post #176,631 by daemon 9/27/04 10:00:10 PM Reply	18 mph in the van at those speeds currently my nissan gets 26 mph much less power than the buick regards, daemon

2004 buick century - (daemon) - (16) - Sept. 27, 2004, 05:02:33 PM EDT

28 mpg impresses you?? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 27, 2004, 07:46:55 PM EDT

Not bad for ~ 90 mph. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2004, 07:51:09 PM EDT

18 mph in the van at those speeds - (daemon) - Sept. 27, 2004, 10:00:10 PM EDT

That's a smaller tank than my Laguna. - (pwhysall) - (12) - Sept. 28, 2004, 03:47:13 AM EDT

That's about the same economy as my Lancer. - (static) - (11) - Sept. 28, 2004, 08:45:54 AM EDT

I get slightly less MPG when... - (folkert) - (10) - Sept. 28, 2004, 01:33:56 PM EDT

What kills me... - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Sept. 28, 2004, 05:48:51 PM EDT

Dunno about mpg... - (pwhysall) - (6) - Sept. 28, 2004, 05:54:29 PM EDT

Re: Dunno about mpg... - (daemon) - (3) - Sept. 28, 2004, 06:09:26 PM EDT

That's Holland, though. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2004, 06:13:01 PM EDT

Re: That's Holland, though. - (daemon) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2004, 06:19:40 PM EDT

Cheap as chips here, too. - (pwhysall) - Sept. 29, 2004, 01:59:41 AM EDT

You know the diff between a porcupine and a BMW, right? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2004, 11:36:56 AM EDT

:) BMW == Break My Windows -NT - (Meerkat) - Sept. 29, 2004, 05:18:07 PM EDT

when I hear "Honda Engineering" - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2004, 05:54:40 PM EDT

With Toyota, you get both ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 28, 2004, 05:56:22 PM EDT