Re: not a good place to start a OOP v. TOP flameware

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #17,459

by pwhysall

11/9/01 5:50:47 AM

Re: not a good place to start a OOP v. TOP flameware

I tend to prefer dynamicly-typed (or type-free) languages descended from the Algol traditions (C, Pascal, VB, etc) that have good dictionary-array syntax, named parameters, parent scope "inheritance", etc.

That'd be Perl or Python then. Your anti-OO mania precludes you from trying Ruby, I'm afraid.

Peter
Shill For Hire
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]

Temporarily re-connected - (tablizer) - (13) - Nov. 3, 2001, 11:32:55 PM EST

sheer joy that you have a gig. -NT - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 3, 2001, 11:43:27 PM EST

Thanks! Jobs to all! Even Delphi fans :-) -NT - (tablizer) - (5) - Nov. 3, 2001, 11:54:15 PM EST

COBOL - (gdaustin) - (4) - Nov. 4, 2001, 10:24:01 AM EST

not a good place to start a OOP v. TOP flameware - (tablizer) - (3) - Nov. 4, 2001, 04:27:53 PM EST

Lighten Up - (gdaustin) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2001, 03:02:20 PM EST

Imma heavy - (tablizer) - Nov. 8, 2001, 11:42:52 PM EST

Re: not a good place to start a OOP v. TOP flameware - (pwhysall) - Nov. 9, 2001, 05:50:47 AM EST

Good stuff - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 4, 2001, 04:15:39 AM EST

I think the phrase I'd use is... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2001, 01:43:04 PM EST

Heh.. I'd still like to se Tablizer come up with an - (Ashton) - Nov. 5, 2001, 08:45:24 PM EST

Congrats! Hope it works out well. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 5, 2001, 01:51:29 PM EST

FYI - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2001, 08:55:49 PM EST

The Beatles and OOP - (tablizer) - Nov. 8, 2001, 11:58:50 PM EST

iwethey.org

So, what we gonna do tonight, Bwain?
97 ms