Space is big.

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #174,082 by pwhysall 9/14/04 12:40:45 AM Reply	Space is big. Very, very big. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #174,083 by drewk 9/14/04 12:49:29 AM Reply	I believe the technical term for it is ... hyarge === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #174,115 by ben_tilly 9/14/04 2:27:15 AM Reply	Not so big If it encounters a phenomena capable of prolonged exponential growth. Particularly over geological timescales. Which was Von Neumann's point. Once a civilization starts expanding, its ability to expand also expands. The result is an exponential ability to consume local resources, which is more than enough to fuel an indefinite spread through the galaxy at rates which are only limited by Einstein's theories. The result at 1% of the speed of light is 10 million years to cover the galaxy - which is an eyeblink in geological time. Even at 0.1% of the speed of light we could easily reach and colonize the entire Local Cluster (that includes the Andromeda galaxy) before the Sun burns out. It take a truly astronomical coincidence (no pun intended) to find another advanced technological society in our galaxy that has not yet arrived at Earth. Cheers, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #174,185 by drewk 9/14/04 11:41:48 AM Reply	Question about that theory Does he say that we could have reached any place in that area, or that we could have colonized all places in that area? === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #174,194 by ben_tilly 9/14/04 12:02:22 PM Reply	The latter We can get exponential growth if we have unlimited resources but are limited to cubic growth by Einstein. Since exponential growth is faster than cubic, in the limit we can theoretically completely use the resources of an expanding volume of space. Cheers, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #174,124 by Meerkat 9/14/04 3:28:52 AM Reply	I thought it was a long way to the chemists. But that's just peanuts to space. And so on. Two out of three people wonder where the other one is.

Where the hell is everybody? - (inthane-chan) - (43) - Sept. 13, 2004, 10:48:25 AM EDT

Easy... - (admin) - Sept. 13, 2004, 10:56:43 AM EDT

Light is slow. Universe is big. Catastrophes happen. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 13, 2004, 11:17:08 AM EDT

Not if you believe Von Neumann - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 13, 2004, 11:32:41 AM EDT

Looking for radio signals is probably futile. - (Andrew Grygus) - Sept. 13, 2004, 11:44:18 AM EDT

Re: Where the hell is everybody? - (deSitter) - (2) - Sept. 13, 2004, 04:55:19 PM EDT

So what's your answer? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Sept. 13, 2004, 04:57:57 PM EDT

Don't think it's a valid question at this point - (deSitter) - Sept. 13, 2004, 05:04:22 PM EDT

Where? Well.. the Why has been done by Calvin & Hobbes - (Ashton) - Sept. 13, 2004, 05:16:22 PM EDT

The speed of light is too low. - (static) - (24) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:29:44 AM EDT

It is clear the speed of light must be exceeded. - (Andrew Grygus) - (20) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:35:34 AM EDT

Not a joke! -NT - (deSitter) - Sept. 14, 2004, 02:03:27 AM EDT

I believe and nearly always have... - (folkert) - (10) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:05:12 AM EDT

The problem with C is that it's a hard limit. -NT - (pwhysall) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:16:36 AM EDT

I don't think we'll ever exceed C myself. - (inthane-chan) - (5) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:21:51 AM EDT

OT: What's C++ all about, then? :) -NT - (Meerkat) - (4) - Sept. 15, 2004, 12:03:00 AM EDT

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 15, 2004, 12:21:01 AM EDT

Demonstrating that you can't - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 15, 2004, 10:44:48 AM EDT

Hmmm - (imric) - Sept. 15, 2004, 10:48:58 AM EDT

Simple - (admin) - Sept. 15, 2004, 10:58:15 AM EDT

Re: I believe and nearly always have... - (deSitter) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:22:50 AM EDT

There is no evidence that they affect each other - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:27:36 AM EDT

Replying to my own... to address the others. - (folkert) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:04:18 PM EDT

Metaphysics wise - (ChrisR) - (7) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:30:04 AM EDT

Re: Metaphysics wise - (deSitter) - (6) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:03:09 PM EDT

No... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:08:02 PM EDT

Re: No... - (deSitter) - (2) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:55:53 PM EDT

There are materials with negative refractive indexes. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 01:32:33 PM EDT

Re: There are materials with negative refractive indexes. - (deSitter) - Sept. 14, 2004, 01:53:55 PM EDT

Well, if we can't speed up light.... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:08:53 PM EDT

That would be one of my favourite passages. :-) -NT - (static) - Sept. 14, 2004, 09:12:32 PM EDT

It's not the getting there, it's slowing down enough to look - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:37:14 AM EDT

Right - (deSitter) - Sept. 14, 2004, 02:11:13 AM EDT

Re: The speed of light is too low. - (deSitter) - Sept. 14, 2004, 02:01:32 AM EDT

Space is big. - (pwhysall) - (5) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:40:45 AM EDT

I believe the technical term for it is ... hyarge -NT - (drewk) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:49:29 AM EDT

Not so big - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 14, 2004, 02:27:15 AM EDT

Question about that theory - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:41:48 AM EDT

The latter - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:02:22 PM EDT

I thought it was a long way to the chemists. But that's - (Meerkat) - Sept. 14, 2004, 03:28:52 AM EDT

Don't know enough - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 01:21:13 AM EDT

Re: Don't know enough - (deSitter) - Sept. 14, 2004, 02:04:39 AM EDT

Might like some MMORPGs - (Meerkat) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 03:30:59 AM EDT

Your .sig is oddly appropriate. :) -NT - (inthane-chan) - Sept. 14, 2004, 10:52:02 AM EDT

iwethey.org

To be in England, in the summertime... close to the edge.
179 ms