Post #173,627
9/10/04 9:41:09 PM
|

The big question is
Did they ever tell us who discovered these new documents, and how they were discovered? I think if they were genuine, they could tell us that, couldn't they?
Nightowl >8#
"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop." -- Robert Hughes, Australian Art Critic, Writer
|
Post #173,632
9/10/04 9:48:26 PM
|

It depends on who they got them from, and the conditions.
|
Post #173,634
9/10/04 11:07:24 PM
|

Probably not
If they are legitimate, then they where probably given to somebody at CBS by somebody that works at a military files storage department. Which is to say that handing them over was technically illegal. The military probably couldn't actually send them to jail but they would lose their job and career if they where identified.
|
Post #173,641
9/10/04 11:47:48 PM
|

NYTimes story: CBS won't disclose source.
[link|http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/11/politics/campaign/11guard.html?pagewanted=print&position=|Here]: Bill Glennon, a technology consultant in New York who worked for I.B.M. in Midtown Manhattan for 14 years and repaired typewriters throughout that time, said that the Executive had proportional spacing and that its typebar could be fitted with superscript characters. Documents from the period show the Air Force tested the Selectric Composer as early as April 1969. But spokesmen for the National Guard and Texas Air National Guard said it was impossible to trace the machines that Colonel Killian's unit, the 111th Fighter Intercept Squadron, or any unit, used so long ago.
Mark Allen, chief of the external media division of the National Guard Bureau public affairs office, said there was no way to reconstruct the equipment or whether Colonel Killian typed the memos or had a clerk type them.
"It's sheer speculation as to what might have transpired,'' Mr. Allen said, "and it's pointless for us to get into that kind of speculation."
[...]
Experts on documents said the veracity of the CBS memos might never be known because they had been copied so many times. CBS News officials said that its papers were copies, too, and that it did not have the originals. The network said it would not identify its original source.
Mr. Rather said, "We worked long and hard and became convinced that, yes, this person had the capacity to get the documents, and, yes, this person was truthful."
Mr. Matley, the documents expert, said in an interview after the program, that he had examined documents and handwriting since 1985 and had testified in 65 trials. Mr. Matley said the documents the network sent him were so deteriorated from copying that it was impossible to identify the typeface.
"It's sheer speculation to say that you couldn't have done that until a computer came along,'' he said.
As a result, he said, he focused on the signatures. CBS sent him the four newfound documents, as well as others that have been verified as signed by Colonel Killian. "There were significant similarities and the differences were insignificant," he said in the configuration of letters and the angle of the writing. It sounds as if it's going to be one of those situations that never ends in a definitive resolution since the originals aren't available. I think I'm about done on this topic. Is that a "Hallelujah!!!" I hear? :-) Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #173,644
9/10/04 11:55:41 PM
|

Nope.
I think I'm about done on this topic. Is that a "Hallelujah!!!" I hear? :-) Not from me, I'm fascinated by document comparison and handwriting comparison. It's been something I've always been fascinated with. Nightowl >8#
"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop." -- Robert Hughes, Australian Art Critic, Writer
|
Post #173,653
9/11/04 12:38:12 AM
9/11/04 12:38:22 AM
|

This is pure bull
Proportional vs. monospaced is a strawman. Yes there were proportional fonts available. It does not explain why a Word document matches so closely. Unless someone can produce similarly close match w/o the use of Word (I'd even allow the use of any other computer software, or, of course, any mechanical device), the document stays fake.
Another thing that shuld be easy to verify: was superscript "th" common in other documents by the same author? There should be quite a volume of paperwork filed away by the Air Force NG from that time.
Still another thing: we have a senior officer, presumably throughly skilled in navigating bureacracy. At least skilled enough to file a CYA memo. DOes the wording of memo match such skill? Would somebody who realizes he is on the pull minefield title the document that's supposed to save him later "CYA"? Mr. Roomberg could you chime in?
(edit: misspelled name)
--
... a reference to Presidente Arbusto. -- [link|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001417.html|Geoffrey K. Pullum]

Edited by Arkadiy
Sept. 11, 2004, 12:38:22 AM EDT
|
Post #173,667
9/11/04 9:09:14 AM
|

dumb question
if I was writing a word processing program, would I want it to have at least the capabilities of the typewriter I wanted to replace? thanx, bill
These miserable swine, having nothing but illusions to live on, marshmallows for the soul in place of good meat, will now stoop to any disgusting level to prevent even those miserable morsels from vanishing into thin air. The country is being destroyed by these stupid, vicious right-wing fanatics, the spiritual brothers of the brownshirts and redstars, collectivists and authoritarians all, who would not know freedom if it bit them on the ass, who spend all their time trying to stamp, bludgeon, and eviscerate the very idea of the individual's right to his own private world. DRL questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #173,676
9/11/04 9:51:47 AM
|

Ahh
Haven't read it.
OK, I'll go look.
|
Post #173,677
9/11/04 10:05:22 AM
|

Nope, not good CYA
Looking here, at the comparative screenshots:
[link|http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=12526_Bush_Guard_Documents-_Forged|http://littlegreenfo...Documents-_Forged]
He admitted to wrong doing with very little pushing. No one threatened him directly. He "backdated" since it was the expedient thing to do, while claiming moral highground by not rating?
Feels wrong. There is nothing that would save this person from charges if it was found later, and admits too much.
Add the typeface, kerning, word breaks, superscript issues (remember, I'm in junk mail). It is VERY difficult to match original text layout when reproducing it on the computer. We might spend hours on a single paragraph if it really needs to be done. It rarely does. If they need the EXACT text/layout, we use a graphics of the original, rather than try to create it ourselves.
If this person REALLY duplicated using word defaults, then it seals it. Fake.
Do the test yourself. I'm not going to bother.
|
Post #173,680
9/11/04 10:15:13 AM
|

Manual typewriters don't kern.
But I don't see any kerning in either of these shots.
|
Post #173,681
9/11/04 10:20:31 AM
|

On the other hand, the upshifted "th" will not be shown
on the screen, as he said. Not sure what happens when it is printed. Easy enough to physically cut and paste to move it up.
|
Post #173,688
9/11/04 11:22:42 AM
|

Kerning wasn't added and it's off by default in Word
|
Post #173,693
9/11/04 12:12:50 PM
|

You're right
--
... a reference to Presidente Arbusto. -- [link|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001417.html|Geoffrey K. Pullum]
|
Post #173,692
9/11/04 12:10:46 PM
|

I did.
[link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=173598|Post #173598]
--
... a reference to Presidente Arbusto. -- [link|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001417.html|Geoffrey K. Pullum]
|
Post #173,996
9/13/04 5:44:59 PM
|

IBM Selectric Composer
Somebody tried....
[link|http://shapeofdays.typepad.com/the_shape_of_days/2004/09/the_ibm_selectr.html|http://shapeofdays.t..._ibm_selectr.html]
--
... a reference to Presidente Arbusto. -- [link|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001417.html|Geoffrey K. Pullum]
|
Post #174,004
9/13/04 6:05:20 PM
|

Thanks.
|
Post #174,017
9/13/04 8:41:33 PM
|

Wow
It's remarkable that the kerning is so similar - I'd say identical with some variation allowed for operation of the device. Did Microsoft just *steal* the algorithm, or perhaps use a well-known one? After all it's a fairly simple problem depsite its complex appearence.
-drl
|
Post #174,021
9/13/04 9:08:59 PM
|

The Story of Times (New) Roman
By [link|http://www.truetype.demon.co.uk/articles/times.htm|Charles Bigelow]. Info on TrueType is on that site too, [link|http://www.truetype.demon.co.uk/tthist.htm|A History of TrueType].
They're good reads.
Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #174,025
9/13/04 9:27:20 PM
|

Thanks, very entertaining and informational!
All that fuss over a font! Heheh!
All I know is that I like Times New Roman best when writing standard Word documents.
Nightowl >8#
"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop." -- Robert Hughes, Australian Art Critic, Writer
|
Post #174,032
9/13/04 9:55:49 PM
|

New Century Schoolbook is the One True Font! 60 kB .gifs. (new thread)
Created as new thread #174031 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=174031|New Century Schoolbook is the One True Font! 60 kB .gifs.]
|
Post #173,687
9/11/04 11:19:52 AM
|

Well, that's incorrect, isn't?
But spokesmen for the National Guard and Texas Air National Guard said it was impossible to trace the machines that Colonel Killian's unit, the 111th Fighter Intercept Squadron, or any unit, used so long.
Forget the machine, this was a military organization, they thrive on paperwork. Look for other documentation produced by Colonel Killian around the same time period and see if the documents match up. The FOIA should be able to produce tons of documentation.
|