Arguing with a CS Person of a large router company

Post #17,103 by boxley 11/7/01 8:47:35 AM Reply	Arguing with a CS Person of a large router company (not cisco) who doesnt unnerstand the concept of IP networks atall. Just wanted a sanity check. thanx, bill tshirt front "born to die before I get old" thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"
Post #17,158 by Brandioch 11/7/01 1:53:51 PM Reply	Version of RIP? Cisco offers a few different ways to update the routing tables. They do NOT have to be the same network. They DO have to be able to route to each other (try with ping). They SHOULD BE the save way on all (RIP, RIP2, EIGRP, whatever).
Post #17,177 by boxley 11/7/01 3:05:38 PM Reply	RIP 2 #DEBUG 11/07/2001 15:21:56 ripRoute (test): sending v2 update to 255.255.255.255 DEBUG 11/07/2001 15:21:56 ripRoute (test): Tx 4.4.4.4/32->0.0.0.0,metric 1,tag 0 DEBUG 11/07/2001 15:21:56 ripRoute (default): source: 10.10.1.1 is not a directly-connected network 2 routers a T1 serial interface encapped ppp betwee them, RIPv2 is enabled on bothsides. Need to reconfigure a couple of ciscos cause I am sure they can do this. Although it prolly doesnt matte much because RIP is kinda falling away as OSPF and BGP are more prominent in large networks. Besides why have all that spamming every 30 seconds. thanx, bill tshirt front "born to die before I get old" thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"
Post #17,349 by Brandioch 11/8/01 1:39:36 PM Reply	Let me check on this. I'll see what I can find.
Post #22,440 by Brandioch 12/26/01 2:07:26 PM Reply	Sorry for the delay. I just found this message again. Okay, there has to be a single network in common on both the serial interfaces. 10.1.1.0(eth0)cisco(serial0)192.168.1.1---t1---192.168.1.2(serial0)cisco(eth0)192.168.100.0 route rip2 network 10.1.1.0 network 192.168.100.0 redistribute route

Welcome to IWETHEY!