IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New WashPost 8/21/2004:
[link|http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21239-2004Aug21.html|Swift Boat Accounts Incomplete And Flawed]:

An investigation by The Washington Post into what happened that day suggests that neither side has been entirely forthcoming, and that each has withheld information from the public record.

[...]

The Post's research shows that both accounts contain significant flaws and factual errors. This reconstruction of the climactic day in Kerry's military career is based on more than two dozen interviews with former crewmates and officers who served with him, as well as research in the Naval Historical Center here, where the Swift boat records are preserved. Kerry himself was the only surviving skipper on the river then who declined a request for an interview.

[...]

In "Tour of Duty," these thoughts are attributed to a "diary" kept by Kerry. But the endnotes to Brinkley's book say that Kerry "did not keep diaries in these weeks in February and March 1969 when the fighting was most intense." In the acknowledgments to his book, Brinkley suggests that he took at least some of the passages from an unfinished book proposal Kerry prepared some time after November 1971, more than two years after he had returned home from Vietnam.

[...]

Even if Kerry did write the March 13 after-action report, it seems unlikely that he would have been the source of the information about "enemy bullets" flying around Thurlow. The official witness to those events, according to Thurlow's medal recommendation form, was Radioman 1st Class Robert Lambert, a member of his crew. The Post was unable to trace Lambert before publication of this article.

In a telephone interview, the head of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, retired Adm. Roy Hoffmann, who commanded all Swift boats in Vietnam, said he believed that Kerry wrote the March 13 after-action report on the basis of numerical identifiers at the top of the form. He later acknowledged that the numbers referred to the Swift boat unit, and not to Kerry personally. "It's not cast-iron, I agree with you," he said.

[...]

Although Kerry campaign officials insist that they have published Kerry's full military records on their Web site (with the exception of medical records shown briefly to reporters earlier this year), they have not permitted independent access to his original Navy records. A Freedom of Information Act request by The Post for Kerry's records produced six pages of information. A spokesman for the Navy Personnel Command, Mike McClellan, said he was not authorized to release the full file, which consists of at least a hundred pages.

[...]


Neither side is telling the whole truth. Whoda thunkit. :-(

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: WashPost 8/21/2004:
Neither side is telling the whole truth. Whoda thunkit. :-(

Ah, but what this means is that John Kerry is a liar who shouldn't be elected, because what America and the world NEEDS is four more years of aggressive military intervention around the world, paid for in American dollars and lives. There quite simply is NO OTHER WAY to ensure that the US citizen is safe as they go about their business. And if this safety means that your phone is tapped, your private electronic communications backdoored by the government, your face is stored in a database, and that you are required to prove who you are just to walk down the street, then I think you'll find that it's a price worth paying.

In short, we'll all have to have a lot less freedom in order to have more freedom.

So Vote Bush. It's the American thing to do. The voting machine will know that you did, anyway, and that data will be kept for "analysis".

Don't do anything un-American, now.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
     Swift Vet Thurlow hangs tough under fire - (marlowe) - (13)
         well sir, produce the report - (boxley) - (1)
             It's Kerry who's withholding evidence, not me. - (marlowe)
         Hey Marlowe - you ought to read this - (lincoln) - (3)
             Hey lincoln, you ought to read the top of the thread. - (marlowe) - (2)
                 I replied to the Thurlow story - (lincoln)
                 you have proof Kerry authored the report? - (boxley)
         But he hasn't presented evidence. - (Another Scott) - (3)
             It's an ewewitness account, dude. - (marlowe) - (2)
                 Um, let's review. - (Another Scott)
                 And here's another eyewitness account, dude! - (jb4)
         WashPost 8/21/2004: - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Re: WashPost 8/21/2004: - (pwhysall)
         8/20/2004: FactCheck.org - (Another Scott)

Travelling at the speed of light with the headlights on.
36 ms