That was stupid when you said it before

Post #168,601 by ben_tilly 8/11/04 10:36:03 AM Reply	That was stupid when you said it before And it is still stupid. For your reference, you made this asinine comment about impeachment back at [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=164820\|http://z.iwethey.org...?contentid=164820]. My response then explaining why it is stupid is still relevant. Yours, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #168,720 by orion 8/11/04 4:11:59 PM Reply	Your response was invalid back then and still is invalid. You force me to repeat myself to prove a point. Apparently you've missed it. Your response is illrelevant, not all Republicans support the war in Iraq, and thus you have committed a fallacy. One that you continue to repeat for a second time. *"When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in confederacy against him." - Jonathan Swift* [link\|http://www.xormad.com:4096/district268\|I am from District 268].
Post #168,796 by Ashton 8/11/04 8:28:02 PM Reply	A Masterpiece of purest digital-'think'__!!__For posterity. This can't be meds or lack of same: It's You Naked. Bad Presidents are impeached. If a President isn't impeached: Good President. For the genuine silly person, travel (or reading) merely enables them to misunderstand further and then .. abound in absurdities. Imagining that reiterating doggerel in pseudo-intellectual form .. constitutes something akin to 'proof' of anything but brain dysfuction: probably puts you now beyond further pharm-chem (or most other..) 'help' for your ongoing afflictions. It's.. simply.. You !! to a fare-thee-well.
Post #168,882 by ben_tilly 8/12/04 10:53:24 AM Reply	And this is pointless Your logic is as bad as your spelling. If you're unable to comprehend that current political reality is such that it is virtually impossible that a Republican President would be impeached, then continuing to point out this fact is pointless. I'll make my last attempt before exiting this thread. For an impeachment movement to get off the ground it needs the prospect of commanding majorities in both the House and the Senate. Currently Republicans have those majorities and good enough party organizations to consistently win most votes that they want. That would obviously include the numbers to squelch any criticism of the President. The existence of Republicans who dislike Bush is irrelevant (feel free to learn how to spell that). This is a numbers game. And right now Bush's organization has the numbers on their side. If you don't care to understand this, I don't care. Everyone else here does understand this point. I feel no need to further defend what is obvious and won't bother responding again to you in this thread. Sincerely, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]

Welcome to IWETHEY!