Americans want humanitarian soldiers?
John Kerry's Silver Star is questioned because he is accused of shooting a fleeing, wounded, enemy soldier in the back. In a war where huge amounts of napalm and Agent Orange were dropped from airplanes, the US is concerned that an identifiable and armed enemy soldier was shot in the back? Is the US concerned that soldiers, in a hostile environment, shoot first, intimidate the rest and only use diplomacy when they're sure no one's going to shoot them? The US populace is aware that there are huge numbers of casualties in a war, most of them undeserved? Does the US expect soldiers to behave like civilian police?
We should be glad John Kerry didn't shoot a civilian because of something that looked like a gun. Or am I missing something?
Matthew Greet
But we must kill them. We must incinerate them. Pig after pig, cow after cow, village after village, army after army. And they call me an assassin. What do you call it when the assassins accuse the assassin? They lie. They lie and we must be merciful to those who lie.
- Colonol Kurtz, Apocalypse Now.