
I'm not following that.
You said:
"They could have undressed her...hung her upside down....and looked at her make-up with an electron microscope...they STILL are allowed to refuse her passage...because she refused their screening."
But they didn't.
I asked why they didn't.
You said that that would have violated her rights.
But if you read your quote again, you'll find that you said they COULD do that.
So, if they can do that because she did what she did, how would them doing that violate her rights?