IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum
/
Whyever would you think that?
Post #16,688
by
Silverlock
11/5/01 4:58:46 PM
Reply
Whyever would you think that?
-quote
Wouldn't the language added by one of the parties get more than "cursory review"?
-endquote
It was good enough for McCongress to pass a security act without even a "cursory review", it should be good enough for the DOJ.
/sarcasm
Don Richards,
Proud recipient of the ABBA.
Sniping from unnamed sources at/close to DoJ
- (
Another Scott
)
- (5)
- Nov. 5, 2001, 03:15:17 PM EST
Does this sound odd to anyone else?
- (
Brandioch
)
- (2)
- Nov. 5, 2001, 04:50:01 PM EST
Whyever would you think that?
- (
Silverlock
)
- Nov. 5, 2001, 04:58:46 PM EST
Not given the history...
- (
addison
)
- Nov. 5, 2001, 05:13:12 PM EST
Side note: Ultra-moronic language (heh!) usage
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- Nov. 5, 2001, 06:04:38 PM EST
The thing that gets me is...
- (
jb4
)
- Nov. 6, 2001, 08:03:43 AM EST
i
we
they
.org
Nelson is one of those insulting, conceited, impatient, coffee-drinking, cell-phone-using, Jaguar-driving advertising executives that you find in only two places: the movies and real life. His motto is: Speed up and smell the coffee.
58 ms