You can't see Moore's movie as even containing needles of underreported truth in a haystack of spin? If Moore showed Gore on stage in one place while implying he was somewhere else, then Gore couldn't possibly have shut down the protests of black Democrats in Congress. If Moore implies that Fox News somehow controls the results of an election, then the voter blacklist (pun intended) can't possibly exist despite the sworn testimony of the company that made it. And so on. Is that it?
[link|http://delaware-dem.dailykos.com/story/2004/7/20/18926/6104|Come back when you've debunked the debunking of the debunking of the debunking] and are willing to apply the same criticism to [link|http://www.45net.org/mt/archives/000627.html|DC 9/11]. In closing, let me say:
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375757147/103-8441964-7614256|Those who have followed George W. Bush] know that he's a colossal [link|http://www.bushlies.com/|liar], and has been for a long time. Those that don't know him that well need to be warned.
(Those who worship him, of course, don't give a damn about truth. But the rest should know.)