No drugs allowed according to article

Post #164,787 by broomberg 7/16/04 7:23:58 PM Reply	No drugs allowed according to article
Post #164,790 by deSitter 7/16/04 7:32:34 PM Reply	fat chance -drl
Post #164,793 by bepatient 7/16/04 7:41:52 PM Reply	thin-ly veiled pun If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #164,795 by deSitter 7/16/04 7:46:14 PM Reply	I admit, it was a stretch (mark) -drl
Post #164,797 by bepatient 7/16/04 7:55:54 PM Reply	But what's the >real< skinny? If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #164,799 by deSitter 7/16/04 8:00:22 PM Reply	I'm flab-ber-gas-ted by the decision -drl
Post #164,796 by ben_tilly 7/16/04 7:49:52 PM Reply	Oops, must learn to read... To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]

Obesity a disease - (deSitter) - (10) - July 16, 2004, 03:44:32 PM EDT

There's a nice giveaway to drug companies -NT - (ben_tilly) - (8) - July 16, 2004, 07:08:31 PM EDT

No drugs allowed according to article -NT - (broomberg) - (6) - July 16, 2004, 07:23:58 PM EDT

fat chance -NT - (deSitter) - (4) - July 16, 2004, 07:32:34 PM EDT

thin-ly veiled pun -NT - (bepatient) - (3) - July 16, 2004, 07:41:52 PM EDT

I admit, it was a stretch (mark) -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - July 16, 2004, 07:46:14 PM EDT

But what's the >real< skinny? -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - July 16, 2004, 07:55:54 PM EDT

I'm flab-ber-gas-ted by the decision -NT - (deSitter) - July 16, 2004, 08:00:22 PM EDT

Oops, must learn to read... -NT - (ben_tilly) - July 16, 2004, 07:49:52 PM EDT

That was my first thought - (hnick) - July 16, 2004, 07:26:21 PM EDT

Welcome to IWETHEY!