This one is pretty much BS
The change in Red Hat's accounting is to book revenue by the day rather than by the month. So if they sign a contract partway through the month, they'll only count X days of revenue for the starting month rather than a full month, and then when the end of the contract comes they'll book a fraction of a month less revenue.
This moved their earnings a lot right now because they get a lot more contracts than they have expiring, and furthermore their margins are very thin so a small change in income moved revenues.
But in the long run it is a wash. And as an accounting practice, neither version is at all unreasonable.
Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]