IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Full agreement
I can support three strikes, but only if it's three violent offenses. None of this petty theft crap. You physically assult somebody three times we throw you out of the game, nothing less.

Of course we wouldn't need three strikes laws if our sentencing where sane to begin with. The whole reason we need three stike laws is because violent criminals are let go to make space for non-violent drug offenders that got 20 year mininum sentences.

Jay
New Careful there..
You're coming perilously close to seeking sanity in a nation where lawyers outnumber engineers 10:1 and biznessmen run the new prisons!

Watch your back.


A.
New Re: Careful there..
Forget floride, lets go with nation wide lithum dosages in the water supply.

Jay
New Yup.. "Got Mil^h^h^h -Zac?"_____if there's $ in it...
     3 strikes sentence overturned - (wharris2) - (10)
         Full agreement - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
             Careful there.. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 Re: Careful there.. - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                     Yup.. "Got Mil^h^h^h -Zac?"_____if there's $ in it... -NT - (Ashton)
         so you believe habitual criminals - (boxley) - (1)
             Hey.. we're *all* habitual criminals ___ if ya look close - (Ashton)
         "It should theoretically work." - (static) - (3)
             Is there ANY effective deterrent? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                 I think that might be the wrong question. - (static)
                 Define "deterrent" - (Brandioch)

I can say "where's the bathroom", "how much is that" and "those aren't my drugs" in 187 languages.
61 ms