IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Delta Force has a bad day
[link|http://www.drudgereport.com/flash33.htm|It happens to everyone]

Excerpt:

Delta Force, which prides itself on stealth, had been counterattacked by the Taliban, and some of the Americans had had to fight their way to safety. Hersh has filed his report for the November 12, 2001 issue of the NEW YORKER, on sale Monday.

Twelve Delta members were wounded, three of them seriously.

The intensity and ferocity of the Taliban response "scared the crap out of
everyone," a senior military officer tells Hersh.

The Delta team stormed Mullah Omar's complex, but found little of value,
Hersh reports, and then, "as they came out of the house, the shit hit the
fan," one senior officer says. "It was like an ambush. The Taliban were
fighting with light arms and either [rocket-propelled grenades] or mortars." The team immediately began taking casualties and evacuated.


[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html]
Sometimes "tolerance" is just a word for not dealing with things.
New Happens to everyone?
When I hear words "ambush", "clueless", "adult supervision" - I think it looks like a failure of strategy we're taking there. May be special forces cannot do the job after all.
New Unpleasent realization
I think the military is facing the unpleasent realization that the Taliban soldiers are fundamentally good. They may not have high dicipline or well organized team work but individually they are good simply because the bad ones are already dead.

Jay
New Heh.. Gotta love natural selection - in daily proof.
New Re: Unpleasent realization
I think the military is facing the unpleasent realization that the Taliban soldiers are fundamentally good.

I don't think that they are - as a whole. Based on what I've read of the Afghan/tribal infighting, I don't think they stand a chance of standing up against our guys.

But the guys guarding Omar's stuff *would* be the best they've got.

And sadly, the Military tends to underestimate their opponents all too often.

But even so - I *do not think* that this needs to be said, in the way its being said, right this minute. Its too damn close to helping the Taliban. (Its a damn hard distinction to make between info, and too much).

Addison
New I suspect
But even so - I *do not think* that this needs to be said, in the way its being said, right this minute. Its too damn close to helping the Taliban. (Its a damn hard distinction to make between info, and too much).

I suspect that some of this depressing war news we have heard recently is being leaked intentionally to make it clear this may not end soon.

I don't think that they are - as a whole. Based on what I've read of the Afghan/tribal infighting, I don't think they stand a chance of standing up against our guys.

I didn't mean good as a good army. They have crap for command and control, and little in the way of heavy weapons. If sent in an armored division there is probably nothing they could do to stop it.

What I meant was the individual soldiers have a lot of experience. Some of them have more then a decade of experience in fighting in Afganistan. Some of the Special Forces guys may have never fired on a live enemy before.

Jay
New The key: "not afraid to die"
>> I think the military is facing the unpleasent realization that the Taliban soldiers are fundamentally good. They may not have high dicipline or well organized team work but individually they are good simply because the bad ones are already dead. <<

It is similar to the Japanese in WWII: they will all die fighting, every single fricken one of them. A bullet to the head is equiv to 70 instant virgins to them.

What we need is body-heat-seeking robotlets that buzz or whiz around and shoot at anything living.

In hand-to-hand combat, Samuri Klingons always win. Not nec because they are good, but because death is the highest honour.



________________
oop.ismad.com
New Reality is always so boring.
"In hand-to-hand combat, Samuri Klingons always win. Not nec because they are good, but because death is the highest honour."

Allow me to drag this conversation back to the realm or reason.

#1. There are some individuals willing to take suicide missions.

#2. These people exist in ALL societies. Yes, we have US citizens who will take suicide missions for their government.

#3. Islam does not require ALL (or even a majority) to become suicide bombers.

If it did, we would have been destroyed long ago. Simple math. They infiltrate our boarders (not that hard to do) and drive cars loaded with explosives into buildings. Eventually, we are gone. Every suicide bomber takes out 10 people or more.

Simply put, the Afghan people are fighting to keep their homes safe from us.

We are the invaders.

They know the terrain better than we do.

They are more motivated to stop us on their home ground.

They can hide amongst the locals when not fighting us.

There is NOTHING here that we have not run into in EVERY invasion.

We had it when we were shooting Indians.
The Brits had it with the Zulus.

Invasions are the costliest wars. We did better in Kuwait because we shelled them for MONTHS. We made sure they didn't eat or sleep. Then we mopped them us.

Do the same thing in Afghanistan.

But the politics are different.

Again, you can't use the military to fight a political conflict.

New Two words
Over-fucking-whelming force

This is the military.
We break things and kill people.
We do not do stealth.

What's the difference between the Boy Scouts and the US military?
The Boy Scouts have adult leadership.

Suppress the area with rockets/shells
prior
during
and after
any operations in that area.

A ton of explosives is cheaper than one of our lives.

Also, E&E (escape and evasion) is NOT a "contingency plan".

E&E is what you do when the plans FAIL.

Like I said, this isn't a war we can win.
The politicians need to CLEARLY DEFINE the objectives.
Who do you want killed?
What areas to you want secured?

Then they have to turn it over to the military. And fucking SHOOT any of the officers who risk ANY of their troops. We already own the air. We can take any site we want. Just do it INTELLIGENTLY.

And execute ANYONE who plays to the media. Grandstanding will get your entire unit killed.

I've said it before. Our military is filled with complete MORONS.
The only reason we do so good is that everyone else's is WORSE.
Our luck won't hold out forever.
New Frankly, they couldn't
Like it or not, the political situation in America is different than with the Gulf War. They didn't have the TIME to assemble the overwhelming force to nail them in a clean sweep. (They still haven't take the time, in my opinion). There's a large segment in America that wants action 'now'. Waiting even 3 months is too long for them ("we've been attacked damn it", they say).

It took, what, 6 months to go from Desert Shield to Desert Storm? There's a huge logistics effort to move thousands of tanks, troops, helicopters and planes...not to mention food, hospitals, etc.

We're attacking in less than 30 days.
New The Afghan airforce.
I don't think time matters in this instance.

We're fighting a country that has trouble mustering anything above AK-47's.

Their tanks are from the 60's and 70's.

We already own their airspace.

There's no reason we couldn't achieve any military objective in that country at any time we want.

But you're right. We haven't built the coalition that we had before.

Which is why this is a POLITICAL issue and not a MILITARY issue.

And when you send troops in on political issues, our people get killed.
New Maybe
But I think we've got the political pull at the moment. I still see it simply as a logistics problem at this point. Trying to move large amounts of men and equipment takes time. 30 days isn't enough (imo) except for extremely small operation. (And this, imo, should be more than a small operation)
New That is what the Soviets thought also
________________
oop.ismad.com
New lets review
A shoot and loot operation was set in place to cover a sneak and peek. The counter attack was so fast the sneek and peekers had to bail. This is a command failure of ignorance.
In your neighborhood a gunfight breaks out at a respected neighbors house. You rightly call 911, gather your family and if armed stay nervously ready if it comes your way.
Over there a gunfight breaks out you grab your weapon and hope to hell there is still someone left to kill after you get there or you will feel stupid and slow. We dont realize this.
Sneek and peek works. In ?64? a mixed crew of NZ SAS, ROK Ranger, Brit SAS, US army ranger put into Nam went to the chinese border for a shoot and loot. 300 miles up and 450 back, on foot. Need to find the source for this again, been a long time since I saw this. We need to put in from farther away and spend more time going in. Remember Patton had his ass handed to him in North Africa. Learning period.
thanx,
bill
tshirt front "born to die before I get old"
thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"
New Soft insertion.
One of my favorite terms.
It's when you break in, photograph the data and get out without them ever knowing you've been there.
That way, they will continue to execute plans you know about and you can tear up their forces.

The opposite is when you take the plans or something else so they know you've been there.

This was not a soft operation.

Which is why I'd recommend extreme force. Take the site, hold the site, loot the site, then destroy it as you pull out. In the meantime, waste anyone approaching it.

Different ways to handle it. I prefer overwhelming force. Minimize the potential loss to our troops while maximizing the physical and psychological damage to the enemy.

New I agree
Afghanstan is not something we are going to be able to finesse. The only thing the Taliban will understand is getting killed. I hope we can kill the top bananas first so we can see if the grunts are really so gung ho. If they are, we'll have to kill them too. But there in lies the mistake waiting to happen.

Suppose we kill countless Taliban, they are mostly Pashtun. There is a large reservoir of Pashtun in Pakistan. They will never forget. So even if we are able to install a "friendly government" in Afghanistan, it will be under constant attack from the Pashtun in Pakistan. At best, I think we can hope for dividing the country into north and south. This is mainly a sectarian fight between the Allah-Mongering Pashtun against everyone not Pashtun so they can have all of gloriously rich Afghanistan to themselves. I do not see any way out for the U.S.

Salman Rushdie had a good obvervation, this really is a war of the West against Islam, the medieval, paranoid Islam pushed by bin Laden and the Taliban. They need an enemy to make themselves an alternative to moderate Islam. The West has been chosen as the designated IT. This war (in the large, not merely Afghanistan) will never stop unless Islam changes to be predominately moderate. The rest of the world cannot do that for Islam. It can only do it for itself.

My own belief is there is nothing stopping Islam from sliding into the abyss taking countries and people into it with them. Only when they hit rock bottom and find that with exploding population rates, few economic pluses, and a sense of utter defeat will they throw off the mullahs political chains. It is happening in Iran, it took a generation to start, and it will take another to complete. That leaves the rest us waiting for two generations at least for the Muslim world to repair itself...if they don't wind up blowing up all creation first.
Gerard Allwein
New Pax McDonald's
I remember reading that no two countries with McDonald's in them have ever gone to war with each other.

I'm not so sure if it is still true.

But the concept is still valid.
Economic interdependance.

The people in the other countries have to have something they value that requires trade with other countries.

Can we achieve this in the Middle East?
Aside from just buying oil from them, I mean. That makes a few VERY rich and a lot VERY poor.
New I agree about economic interdependence
However, I'm dubious that Muslim countries will embrace it. They do not want any foreign, infidel influence. I believe they have the Breshnev doctrine: what's mine is mine and what is yours is open to discussion.

It seems to me that one spiral they can easily slip into is the spiral caused by overpopulation and poverty. The rulers will find some outside force to blame (the idea of taking responsibility seems foreign also). And the mullahs will be there offering the bliss that can only follow true Muslim conversion of everyone in the country. Not rich yet, well, yer not Muslim enough...gotta have that good old time Sharia law in order for the fountain of wealth to be discovered. Meanwhile, I see no effort or belief in population control. "If Allah wills it" is not an effective birth control device since for most men, Allah wills it be used. It isn't a male dominated religion for nothing.

By the way, Saudi Arabia has a population explosion now, more than half the pop. is below 20 (or some incredibly high figure in the near vacinity). They won't all be selling oil. They are not being taught any industrial skills in the Muslim schools. They are being taught the Koran. What will these people do when they reach 18? It might be the only thing they have to do is start a war.
Gerard Allwein
New The Great Satan
Well, then it looks like our only hope is to corrupt Islam from within.

It isn't like we don't already have experience with that. Check out what we've done with Christianity.

Santa
The Easter Bunny

If our only hope of world survival is a claymation special of "How the Camel Saved Ramadan", then that's what we're going to have to do.

Doesn't Thor have his own comic book?

Hit the less radical elements first.

It will take years, but in the end, they will be good little consumers, just like we are.
New Think Corporate
Grand (projected) opening of

Mullahland

Free tickets for the first three trips. Built by (generouskly paid) Afghan labor + Murican $ - For Afghans and all n-Muslim Flavors of Truth.

Natch the Corp gets Cost+ 10, 20% - whatever the hysteria will bear. Free mp3 / CD players and CDs to take home; nekkid gurlz for the palm-pilot ones (a step-up freebie after 2 paid visits). Triple-bacon cheeseburgers to start their decline as a relatively healthy group; Rap to further cognitive dissonance - then basic training in why it is that the logo on yer shoes is more important than Mom and the Mosque. Rampant desire for More.. shall follow.

EZ. Like taking baby from candy.

Spread US around! I say.
New Re: Think Corporate
Thomas Friedman had a good observation, when Ayatollah Khomeni decreed the U.S. The Great Satan, he was refering to the Satan of the Koran who is a whisperer of evil deeds, he works by subtle coersion. This is precisely what you are suggesting. And it is precisely what is pissing off the Islamo-Fascists.

I do agree that this is one way to defeat them bastards. But, with it needs to be a unrelenting exportation of democracy and free enterprise. In short, we need to export the American revolution. We need to export it to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iraq, etc. And we need to export respect for women, and not the "keep'em hidden and pregnant" respect of "Islamic Culture", but the American respect where we don't piss'em off for fear of what they might do to us in our sleep.
Gerard Allwein
New You got it.
Once the first Islamic Strip Malls get started, the free Ayatollah dolls for the kiddies at McMuhammad Greaseburgers set in AND

The Credit Cards start eroding any chance of saving for construction of your very own hovel or train money outta there: We Got'em by the Short Hair!

Greed, massive Corporate-fostered Greed shall save us from them (alas it won't do shit for their lives, but then.. Capitalism hasgottado what Capitalism Does. We understand that.)

{sigh}

Is this against the Geneva Convention or What?



A.
New monetary concerns
Ashton, there is notion wherein one focused on economic greed isn't focused on nuking his/her neighbors, s/he's interested in making a buck off of them. I fully agree that this is what animates Western economic society. It has a certain purity not found in any religion. The greed that causes one to kill one's neighbor and take his/her belongings is bad greed. But greed in itself, its essence is not bad, it is free enterprise. Presumably there are enough morals out there to keep it in bounds.

But, we are fighting the wrong fight, my people (conservatives/liberatarians). Up until now we figured NOW was a bunch of bra-burning bitches who wanted nothing more than total domination. We lost that fight long ago, about the time we figured how to get those damn clasps undone with one hand.

I feel it is our Patriotic Duty to give NOW the global voice it has always wanted. Which group of Short Penised Islamic Freaks do you think are scared witless of a bunch of bra-burning, veil burning, Islamic women who just might be pissed off over years of subjugation? I suddenly have warm fuzzies for NOW and I think we owe it to the Islamic countries to give them a voice...a goddamn LOUD voice...a NOW Voice of America.

Once we hit those slime sucking bastards with a weapon of these devious proportions, no one will dare fuck with us again lest the weapon be turned upon their infidel, male dominated selves.

Waddya think?
Gerard Allwein
New Hmm.. thine depravity c'est magnif\ufffdque!
One must recall however that.. the bra-burning occurred during an infantile, nay nascent period of Questioning Authority -- before it was recognized by females generally, that -- joining the Rebels on the barricades meant:

Drop drawers on command, do the cooking, washing, mailing - and always.. look up (from below) with rampant adoration: then.. Us Guys\ufffd might.. let you play too.

So the only flaw might be: that a couple of Their Females too, might just er review the Murican '60s-'70s and decide to skip the nascent stage and go directly to [your current Male-approved Version 1.b.1.02]. But this elides the initial step of: ingratiation at any cost. An essential step for the strategy to work.

Besides, infantile Infidels untutored in proper penis practice, 'cept in their dreams: faced with adult females unencumbered by the Taleban-process [they have plenty there already, given the films from the UK lass who interviewed a few] ...

just might find it less threatening.. to apply for a loaded body-suit and, let Allah provide the concupiscent ones who won't laugh at their ineptness (being Dead and all) [??]

Send back to committee for more strategic work, please. I'll pass it on to Anna deVere Smith and maybe Camille Paglia - for any bug-fixing I miss.


Ashton Revolutions Ltd.
Send us your tired, your pissed-on and some money.
We'll send back a SAP plan for social reconstruction.

Free consultation:
There *are* a few other ways to do things which do not rely upon endless and accelerating consumption - as both means and end. But the initial overhead is steep: kill all the lawyers, along with the priests. (that's free, Will S gave it away ~ 1600). Our blueprints are a bit dear however, as is the reward.

Ashton, CRO
Chief Revolutionary Officer
New Demonstration of the 'N' in SNAFU...
Your comment about our being bad and everyone else being worse just reminded me of it.

Cheers,
Ben
New Drudge: Pentagon denies NY'er story of 10/20 raid
The Pentagon's demolishing Hersh's story.

A [link|http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm|rebuttal story] (URL may change) states what was originally claimed for raid. Two deaths occured in a helicopter accident in Pakistan, injuries were sustained by paratroopers landing in Afghanistan, but there was no organized enemy resistance, and there were no casualties or injuries inflicted by the enemy on US forces.
The Taliban probably did return fire. They had that--all those capabilities. We know from other reporting, that they were trying to muster greater capability. They were unable to do so. Our soldiers just simply overwhelmed them.
--
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?
New Even taking the story at face value
it's necessary to keep something in mind.

Our military is subordinate to civilian political processes. That's good, but it does have one undesireable side effect: if there's no actual war in progress, the military turns political.

On another board, somebody posted "Murphy's Laws of Combat". Two of them are:

--No combat-ready unit ever passed inspection

--No inspection-ready unit ever survived combat

During peacetime, the way you get promoted in the military is to do politics well; plays well with others -- white rocks [one of the many things in M.A.S.H. that rings true], meeting the affirmative action quotas, getting good press. I don't think it's fatuous to argue that a person who's good at that sort of thing isn't too likely to be good at what is theoretically his job, the military action part. An officer who spends most of his day meeting deadlines for paperwork submission and juggling appropriations is learning to do paperwork and manage money, not to lead soldiers in combat. This is fairly well inevitable, IMO.

Unfortunately, when real combat starts, you've got desk weenies in charge, and they screw up. When they screw up, they get relieved, and others move into their positions. Eventually you find somebody who screws up less, and that one stays while the rest play musical commands. If the war goes on long enough, you get competent people in enough positions to get the job done, because promotion now comes on military grounds, not political ones.

We're a long way from that point, so I expect to see some ungodly screwups. Even if this story is completely true, look at it this way: Our guys got out, even if wounded. They'll be back, with a different CO, and some different attitudes (not to mention op orders / rules of engagement). Do that enough time, and it'll start being done right.
Regards,
Ric
New Not bad.. beats TM-1232 "How We Fight"
Imagine too.. joining a group whose highest desirable fate is - to never be needed; just to be - a deterrent. In case you thought we couldn't kick the shit out of you, well - just try.

Extreme form: the Rus or 'Our' Raketchiki (missileers). If they ever have to go to work: they and all - have lost! But by threatening to go to work..

Anyway - nice summary of the Military-Peter in Principle. Simpler:

It's a M.A.D. M.A.D. M.A.D. M.A.D. World and we habitually lie to our kids - that we are rational and beneficent. (They notice the lie ~ when they stop waiting for the Great Pumpkin to appear). No wonder there's Rap and overblown saxophones... and a possible Dubya/Gore at the helm, depending on the coin flip.


Ashton
How do I get outta this chicken outfit?
     Delta Force has a bad day - (marlowe) - (27)
         Happens to everyone? - (Arkadiy)
         Unpleasent realization - (JayMehaffey) - (5)
             Heh.. Gotta love natural selection - in daily proof. -NT - (Ashton)
             Re: Unpleasent realization - (addison) - (1)
                 I suspect - (JayMehaffey)
             The key: "not afraid to die" - (tablizer) - (1)
                 Reality is always so boring. - (Brandioch)
         Two words - (Brandioch) - (16)
             Frankly, they couldn't - (Simon_Jester) - (3)
                 The Afghan airforce. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                     Maybe - (Simon_Jester)
                     That is what the Soviets thought also -NT - (tablizer)
             lets review - (boxley) - (10)
                 Soft insertion. - (Brandioch) - (9)
                     I agree - (gtall) - (8)
                         Pax McDonald's - (Brandioch) - (7)
                             I agree about economic interdependence - (gtall) - (6)
                                 The Great Satan - (Brandioch) - (5)
                                     Think Corporate - (Ashton) - (4)
                                         Re: Think Corporate - (gtall) - (3)
                                             You got it. - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                 monetary concerns - (gtall) - (1)
                                                     Hmm.. thine depravity c'est magnif\ufffdque! - (Ashton)
             Demonstration of the 'N' in SNAFU... - (ben_tilly)
         Drudge: Pentagon denies NY'er story of 10/20 raid - (kmself) - (2)
             Even taking the story at face value - (Ric Locke) - (1)
                 Not bad.. beats TM-1232 "How We Fight" - (Ashton)

Jabber is not a command line!
177 ms