IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New In 2?
Okay, I missed that one, I thought it was 3.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Here's the game
There are minor variations, this is the one that I played.
\n1. g4    e5\n2. f3   Qh4++\n

Or for Ross,
\n1. P-KN4  P-K4\n2. P-KB3  Q-KR5++\n

Cheers,
Ben

PS Sorry for the unintentional demonstration of how easy it is to get confused with the old notation. I knew that the key move was to be made by the Q, so I was putting Q where K belonged. :-(
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Expand Edited by ben_tilly July 8, 2004, 02:36:35 PM EDT
New Wouldn't that be ...
1. P-KN4  P-K4\n2. P-KB3  Q-KR5++

===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     Rook to Knight Four -NT - (lister) - (12)
         It's a trap!!! -NT - (ChrisR) - (1)
             He wasn't always this way. - (admin)
         Not a legal opening move. - (ben_tilly) - (9)
             Re: Not a legal opening move. - (deSitter) - (3)
                 Depends which classics - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                     Re: Depends which classics - (deSitter) - (1)
                         Let's compare the same sequence in algebraic - (ben_tilly)
             It's the "Out of Left Field" opening move - (lister) - (4)
                 In that vein, my favorite "out of left field move" is... - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                     In 2? - (drewk) - (2)
                         Here's the game - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                             Wouldn't that be ... - (drewk)

It was a good party...
43 ms