Can see only exponential stickiness coming -

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #161,096 by Ashton 6/22/04 5:40:50 PM Reply	Can see only exponential stickiness coming - What if a Greed-gene is discovered? Say one which demonstrates a high propensity for antisocial behaviour like .. umm Repo-ism? or Ingratitude? or a tendency towards Bachelier's EDO calculus :-0 (yeah, saw the Nova on the Trillion Dollar Bet) One might be willing to roll the dice among the 5-17 possible sex orientations ?\|? but.. what about a combo Trumpish/Cheneyesque syndrome? -- realizing that 'sonny' would decidedly triple your rent, in your old age. Ah well - if we can we will. The Priest Class will have apoplexy. What could be more amusing? Love. It.
Post #161,128 by JayMehaffey 6/22/04 9:40:15 PM Reply	They might be complaining now, but just wait The priests are complaining about all this testing and stuff right now, but just wait. Eventually they will find the gene for religiosity, and then the priests will be reworking their justifications to say that children without that gene are touched by the devil and must be removed for the good of humanity. Jay
Post #161,136 by Ashton 6/22/04 10:31:46 PM Reply	Hey! yer no fun ..you already know the Master Code :-0

Abortion question becoming even more complex - (JayMehaffey) - (24) - June 22, 2004, 01:53:53 PM EDT

first you have to define defect - (boxley) - (2) - June 22, 2004, 02:05:21 PM EDT

Not 100% accurate - (JayMehaffey) - June 22, 2004, 02:10:01 PM EDT

Re: first you have to define defect - (danreck) - June 23, 2004, 05:38:40 PM EDT

Can see only exponential stickiness coming - - (Ashton) - (2) - June 22, 2004, 05:40:50 PM EDT

They might be complaining now, but just wait - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - June 22, 2004, 09:40:15 PM EDT

Hey! yer no fun - (Ashton) - June 22, 2004, 10:31:46 PM EDT

World-wide the most commonly acted-on data is... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - June 23, 2004, 10:21:56 AM EDT

Somewhere below that - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - June 23, 2004, 04:28:19 PM EDT

Don't know that "Correctable problem" is in the right spot - (hnick) - (1) - June 23, 2004, 04:45:00 PM EDT

..esp. when the AMA def'n of "cancer / or other cure" - (Ashton) - June 23, 2004, 05:59:09 PM EDT

I have a question for you... - (danreck) - (13) - June 23, 2004, 06:46:19 PM EDT

play the hand you are dealt, sometimes you fold -NT - (boxley) - (3) - June 23, 2004, 07:08:58 PM EDT

Can't always fold, though. - (pwhysall) - (2) - June 24, 2004, 03:53:24 AM EDT

I think fold = die in this case - (ben_tilly) - (1) - June 24, 2004, 04:48:03 PM EDT

Folding is a choice. - (pwhysall) - June 24, 2004, 04:52:36 PM EDT

Not that clear cut - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - June 23, 2004, 10:19:53 PM EDT

Two such eloquent posts as these - (Ashton) - (2) - June 24, 2004, 02:14:11 AM EDT

Since we're nearly "IRCing" - (danreck) - (1) - June 24, 2004, 02:47:30 AM EDT

I've only had one reassuring thought in that whole debate. - (inthane-chan) - June 24, 2004, 10:54:06 AM EDT

Re: Not that clear cut - (danreck) - June 24, 2004, 02:26:44 AM EDT

Downs or no... - (pwhysall) - (3) - June 24, 2004, 10:59:37 AM EDT

Yep. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - June 24, 2004, 11:01:26 AM EDT

You haven't been watching Fear Factor, have you? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - June 24, 2004, 11:09:58 AM EDT

Nope, there they eat the worms. -NT - (inthane-chan) - June 24, 2004, 11:30:40 AM EDT

To boldly go where no LRPD has gone before.
136 ms