A quote from the article.
I think the "lie, cheat, and steal" is appropriate. Actually, in my circles, Microsoft is really ticking off many corporate customers with the required registration stuff and the push to deny corporations the advantage of the OEM Windows License. (Read Brian Livingston in Infoworld and you will get the idea. Basically, if you're a "corporate customer" will 500 or more employees, your OEM Microsoft licenses you received when you purchased the machines are "invalid" and you ARE REQUIRED to purchase new Windows licenses at full retail price. I'm really hoping a big company will take Microsoft to court on this one, and fight it down to the point where Microsoft has to pay billions in settlements.... )
My boss said in a meeting today that when he talks to "clients" (Fortune 1000 grocery and pharmacy companies), they are VERY INTERESTED when he talks about our Unix (HP-UX), DB2, and Java system. He said today in the same meeting that we probably LOST a major Fortune 500 contract in 1998 because we were running NT 4.0, SQL Server, Delphi, and PC Assembler at the time. Reliability and scalability were the driving factors.
Now, word is getting around our industry about our new infrastructure, and the customers are starting to call us. We're about to close a nice contract hopefully in the next couple of weeks for even more work!
The other "disincentive" for Microsoft is that the licensing goons visited us about 1 1/2 years ago, and tapped the corporate coffers to the tune of about $125,000 for a 53 employee company. For a 53 employee company!
No wonder he was interested in talking with me in May when I interviewed! No wonder he hired me right away and we've been buying Unix hardware, DB2, Java, and hiring programmers ever since!
He doesn't want to tap the coffers for another $125,000 next year. In two years, we could be completely Unix/Linux and have the corporate customers lining up to do business with us... At least I sincerely hope so!
Glen Austin