IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Theory and Practice of Programming Forum
/
We have a lot of inserts
Post #158,625
by
bluke
6/6/04 5:24:23 AM
Reply
We have a lot of inserts
Thanks for all the info
How to store a tree structure in a relational db?
- (
bluke
)
- (20)
- June 3, 2004, 04:21:24 PM EDT
Ask Bryce!
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- June 3, 2004, 04:25:06 PM EDT
wiki links
- (
tablizer
)
- June 3, 2004, 11:57:01 PM EDT
Which database engine?
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- June 3, 2004, 05:43:22 PM EDT
Re: Which database engine?
- (
bluke
)
- (1)
- June 4, 2004, 01:46:02 AM EDT
CONNECT BY is out then. :-)
- (
admin
)
- June 4, 2004, 08:06:33 AM EDT
why not store it in a document
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- June 3, 2004, 05:47:47 PM EDT
We want to move away from LDAP ...
- (
bluke
)
- June 4, 2004, 02:06:02 AM EDT
Just use Windows Server 2003 and Active Directory!
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- June 3, 2004, 05:54:38 PM EDT
**thwak!**
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- June 4, 2004, 02:10:53 PM EDT
See what Scott said
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- June 3, 2004, 08:02:09 PM EDT
Before 9i
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- June 3, 2004, 10:27:08 PM EDT
I don't use it, so I wouldn't know. Correction appreciated.
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- June 3, 2004, 10:45:47 PM EDT
Re: How to store a tree structure in a relational db?
- (
johnu
)
- (7)
- June 4, 2004, 08:16:45 AM EDT
AKA Nested Set Trees. :-)
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (6)
- June 4, 2004, 08:54:08 AM EDT
After reading about nested sets ...
- (
bluke
)
- (5)
- June 5, 2004, 02:29:53 PM EDT
Updates aren't an issue.
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- June 5, 2004, 04:48:38 PM EDT
If I had to do it over....
- (
ChrisR
)
- (2)
- June 5, 2004, 11:27:30 PM EDT
That's exactly how I do it.
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- June 6, 2004, 07:19:32 AM EDT
Guess I'll have to try it for myself
- (
ChrisR
)
- June 6, 2004, 02:12:53 PM EDT
We have a lot of inserts
- (
bluke
)
- June 6, 2004, 05:24:23 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
Otherwise there are Deliverance theme parks.
70 ms