IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Disagree on 3rd
1st Pakistan (to secure their nukes)
2nd Indonesia (IF we go at Pakistan, Indonesia will go amok)
3rd would be anyone's guess as the list would escalate so quickly


Don't entirely agree. I believe there would not be a 3rd. After having anihilated[sic] the two most radical Islamic states, with extreme predjudice and without compunction, the other states would be very interested in not being 3rd on the list. I believe this because after having smacked Khaddafi around, he has been a non-issue. I think that a massive show of unrestrained force (should it come to that), along with the message that there is plenty more where that came from, would be sufficient deterent.

Now, of course, there will be some dufus somewhere that will "want to test the resolve", yada, yada, yada. So long as we are willing to exercise that resolve, the situation shouldn't escalate.

(This doesn't, of course, address the side effects of such a course of action...that's probably fodder for another thread.)
jb4
(Resistance is not futile...)
New Problem with your logic . .
. . is that the "countries" (as in governments) do not control the terrorists, nor do they necessarily know who they are or where they are. Those persons are perfectly happy to have us flatten the cities, which are rife with Western influences and "backsliding" Muslims anyway. It will just harden the remaining people to their cause.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New fsck it pull the plug
make the khyber pass a plain one heavy on Tikrit, Bagdad and all the palaces, one 5 kiloton on Bethlehem, Mecca and Jerusalem at the same time, then sit back and say we aint prejuidiced, anyone else want some.
Last resort if a nuke goes off Stateside.
thanx,
bill
tshirt front "born to die before I get old"
thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"
New Re: Other trouble spots that would follow


Bangaldesh (they would be fodder for suicide attacks as country is to poor to do anything)

Malaysia would overthrow Mahattir but can't be sure what they could achieve

Iraq would have internal riots - hopefully Saddam would only be able to rattle his sword

Saudia Arabia might topple then things get nasty as we would have to go in to sieze the oilfields

Gulf States & Oman would probably manage to keep out

Algeria would become a trouble spot

Egypt could fall apart

By this time the Arab & Muslim world would be seething.

Would have to be start of WWW 3

Doug
     Report: U.S. prepping to take Pakistani nukes - (bluke) - (16)
         We'd be crazy not to have such a plan. -NT - (gtall) - (15)
             Agreed. - (inthane-chan) - (14)
                 Re: Agreed. - (gtall) - (13)
                     The more I see of this thing . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (11)
                         Re: The 1st targets of mass attack - (dmarker2) - (7)
                             As heard on Stern (a massive audience who agrees with him) - (boxley) - (2)
                                 Fortunately Stern does not run our foreign policy. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                     Yep.. our instincts were honed in the OK Corral - (Ashton)
                             Disagree on 3rd - (jb4) - (3)
                                 Problem with your logic . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                     fsck it pull the plug - (boxley)
                                 Re: Other trouble spots that would follow - (dmarker2)
                         Ever read Douglas Adams? - (gtall) - (2)
                             Was that "Life, the Universe, and Everything?" - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                 Re: Was that "Life, the Universe, and Everything?" - (gtall)
                     Part of his goal - (JayMehaffey)

So less could be more, more could be less, and nothing could be most of all — sometimes.
38 ms