Post #157,208
5/27/04 11:38:43 AM
|
Periodic Table of Perl 6 operators
No comment.
[link|http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html|http://www.ozonehous...eriodicTable.html]
Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #157,212
5/27/04 11:49:53 AM
|
Passed on, thanks.
I haven't decided if it's actually useful yet. :-)
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #157,213
5/27/04 12:07:21 PM
|
OK, so how do I blow it up so that I can read it?
Enquiring minds want to know....
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
|
Post #157,215
5/27/04 12:07:52 PM
|
Open the PDF
|
Post #157,222
5/27/04 1:05:34 PM
|
D'Oh! RT**Entire**FP!
But...No Workee. About 25% into the download, browser says "Stopped" in the status bar (real helpful, that message...).
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
|
Post #157,214
5/27/04 12:07:34 PM
|
>>shudder<<
|
Post #157,220
5/27/04 12:51:13 PM
|
I like's it...
And I passed it on as well.
Thanks
|
Post #157,292
5/27/04 5:05:47 PM
|
Mockery of knowledge
-drl
|
Post #157,304
5/27/04 5:50:24 PM
|
Eek
I've just decided writing in VB will be more productive.
|
Post #157,310
5/27/04 6:17:14 PM
|
Come on, it isn't that bad
Most of them already exist in Perl 5.
They're just improved. Plus you have hyper-operators. Plus you have stuff from Q::S. Plus...
I have sudden sympathy for all those people who programmed Perl 5 as if it was Perl 4 for so long.
Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #157,324
5/27/04 7:37:28 PM
|
Yeah, me
Remember when the rest of the world went to Perl 5?
I was running SCO, and it Perl 5 did not run on it FOREVER! And the the Oracle libraries did not work.
|
Post #157,328
5/27/04 8:20:47 PM
|
That's programming Perl 4 as Perl 4
Admittedly somewhat past the expiry date. But still...
Amusing note. I saw Unix machines that still did not have Perl 5 as late as 2002. At which point Perl 5 had existed longer than the release history of Perl 1, 2, 3, and 4 combined!
Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #157,336
5/27/04 10:40:30 PM
5/27/04 10:42:04 PM
|
Re: Amusing note.
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" :)
after edit.
Alex
Honor has not to be won; it must only not be lost. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), German philosopher
Edited by a6l6e6x
May 27, 2004, 10:42:04 PM EDT
|
Post #157,339
5/27/04 11:05:08 PM
|
Oh, I understand that. I'm still amused by it though.
The phrase "flea-bitten corpses of dead camels" comes to mind.
Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #157,327
5/27/04 8:02:15 PM
|
When you look at the small image
as early magnetic-ink characters on bank checks..
I distictly read,
MinD FucK
|
