Post #156,955
5/25/04 7:38:39 PM
|
For those with a voyeuristic streak...
Take a look at the "active users" screen.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #156,956
5/25/04 7:54:30 PM
|
And if you haven't realized yet...
... this means you can watch LRPDs being created before the LRPD shows up!
Feed your LRPD addiction in a chronologically anticipatory fashion!
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #156,966
5/25/04 8:43:15 PM
|
THAT ROCKS!
And here I wasn't going to read your post (due to a lack of the aforementioned streak ;) But since you replied to yourself...
|
Post #156,968
5/25/04 8:44:21 PM
|
;-)
Amazing what 5 minutes in an OO-based system will buy you, isn't it...
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #156,970
5/25/04 8:51:05 PM
|
*snicker*. Now, if we could just add the feature... (new thread)
Created as new thread #156969 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=156969|*snicker*. Now, if we could just add the feature...]
|
Post #156,972
5/25/04 8:53:11 PM
|
Hi, morganek! ;)
|
Post #156,973
5/25/04 8:54:00 PM
|
ROFL
I watched him read the post, then go to "active users".
What a tremendous time sink!
Or as Jason used to say, it's a "fidget command".
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #156,974
5/25/04 8:54:23 PM
|
:-)
Big Brother is HERE!
|
Post #156,977
5/25/04 8:55:15 PM
|
Which is a good place to note:
Just toggle off "Show You In Active User List?" if you don't want to be watched.
At some point I may add one to toggle that column only.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #156,980
5/25/04 9:06:25 PM
|
Just gives Boxley more ammunition...
...in his quest to prove that we need to get a life. :-)
|
Post #156,987
5/25/04 9:45:14 PM
|
If you had a life, you wouldn't notice...
his pointing that out. :-P
Cheers, Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|