Specificity

Post #155,565 by drewk 5/17/04 5:28:54 PM Reply	Specificity You could call anyone a "spermatovorish hippo licker". You could also call anyone a "monkey-fucker". Which one seems more suitable to the peado-bestial pussball above? (Those monkeys look awfully young, don't they?) Just checking the "big words I heard in a Monty Python skit" dictionary and calling me some of those could be replaced by a small shell script. o0oo oo0o === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #155,579 by admin 5/17/04 5:53:43 PM Reply	Yabut... I didn't call just anyone a hippo licker. I called you a hippo licker. So picking a phrase that's more suitable for Dan is besides the point, doncha think? I wasn't responding to Dan, and even if I were, I daresay I could come up with something a bit more creative than recycled observations of the obvious, har har, I just made you say 'underwear' type such as you suggested. Doubtless your swiss-cheese memory is busily performing post facto memory editing of Python scripts, but I assure you, I made those words up Just For You. BTW, it's "pedo". HTH! Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #155,581 by pwhysall 5/17/04 5:55:36 PM Reply	Re: Yabut... "Paedo", you semiliterate colonial baboon-faced son of a hobo skunk. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #155,685 by drewk 5/18/04 9:18:09 AM Reply	Wheeee! Dogpile on the admin ... dogpile on the admin ... === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #156,001 by Ashton 5/19/04 7:48:52 PM Reply	Er.. close: p\ufffddo. Not that these insufferable chittering quackenbushes would know fancy shit like word origins.

Welcome to IWETHEY!