Ah, so you don't WANT to do business?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #155,147

5/14/04 11:27:25 AM

Ah, so you don't WANT to do business?

You just have to, right?

Then start off by saying that it is their fault, they are dropping your connection without cause. Back off from that if your side doesn't think that they can win with that argument.

Cheers,
Ben

To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]

Post #155,159

5/14/04 1:09:25 PM

Agree with Ben

Since this is a "forced" partnership, then they should have told you about the line timeout. Since there is nothing in writing, start by blaming them, but back off to a split if legal becomes involved. With legal, it's "your" word against their word, with nothing to support either side.

Fines should be then split and "forgotten". Document everything for next time/issue.

this question has dollars attached to it - (boxley) - (8) - May 14, 2004, 08:30:48 AM EDT

If you must keep the partner - (jbrabeck) - (7) - May 14, 2004, 09:03:59 AM EDT

not costs exactly but FCC fines - (boxley) - (6) - May 14, 2004, 09:12:59 AM EDT

Both parties made an assumption - (jbrabeck) - (5) - May 14, 2004, 09:48:48 AM EDT

fun part, no SLA, just a handshake - (boxley) - (4) - May 14, 2004, 10:58:22 AM EDT

Ah, so you don't WANT to do business? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - May 14, 2004, 11:27:25 AM EDT

Agree with Ben - (jbrabeck) - May 14, 2004, 01:09:25 PM EDT

Can't you send a keepalive? -NT - (Steven A S) - (1) - May 14, 2004, 12:00:09 PM EDT

Guessing - (jbrabeck) - May 14, 2004, 01:06:35 PM EDT

All gravitas is local.
32 ms