well nekkid with hoods on I would say

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #154,723 by boxley 5/11/04 11:01:14 PM Reply	well nekkid with hoods on I would say prove it was me thanx, bill Time for Lord Stanley to get a Tan questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #154,750 by altmann 5/12/04 3:03:14 AM Reply	You would know. Isn't that enough? -- Chris Altmann
Post #154,760 by boxley 5/12/04 8:13:45 AM Reply	No I have much worse pictures in my head If you couldnt prove it was me I cannot be blackmailed. It would be very unlucky for the attempted blackmailer. I doubt Iraqi's are much different in that respect. thanx, bill Time for Lord Stanley to get a Tan questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #154,882 by dmarker 5/12/04 4:30:01 PM Reply	The nature of shame for these guys goes beyond a 'prove it was me' mentality. That attitude is much more 'modern western' Those guys shown such a pic & knowing it was them would not have our tough minded attitude - we would more than likely just state "sure its me, nice body eh !!!' Its all about the nature of shame among Iraqi males Doug M

Pictures to be used for blackmail? - (JayMehaffey) - (15) - May 11, 2004, 06:43:20 PM EDT

Amature Interrigations, Inc. - (tablizer) - (1) - May 11, 2004, 06:51:14 PM EDT

I think the TLA you're looking for is JAL... - (jb4) - May 12, 2004, 10:26:48 AM EDT

The nature of the pics made this clear from the start - (dmarker) - (8) - May 11, 2004, 07:22:09 PM EDT

The female in the picture is enjoing herself way too much - (Arkadiy) - (7) - May 11, 2004, 07:58:47 PM EDT

But why pose for so many of them ? - (dmarker) - (6) - May 11, 2004, 10:10:26 PM EDT

The more the merrier? - (Arkadiy) - May 12, 2004, 08:54:32 AM EDT

She was only following orders. - (bepatient) - (4) - May 12, 2004, 01:17:20 PM EDT

Which is why her boyfriend is in the pics too, I guess. - (admin) - May 12, 2004, 01:46:15 PM EDT

as to who was giving the orders? here is a clue - (boxley) - (1) - May 12, 2004, 02:47:53 PM EDT

New meaning for Conslutant; now a permanent word. -NT - (Ashton) - May 12, 2004, 05:19:59 PM EDT

Hmmm, now where have I heard that before? -NT - (mmoffitt) - May 12, 2004, 05:28:45 PM EDT

well nekkid with hoods on I would say - (boxley) - (3) - May 11, 2004, 11:01:14 PM EDT

You would know. Isn't that enough? -NT - (altmann) - (2) - May 12, 2004, 03:03:14 AM EDT

No I have much worse pictures in my head - (boxley) - (1) - May 12, 2004, 08:13:45 AM EDT

The nature of shame for these guys goes - (dmarker) - May 12, 2004, 04:30:01 PM EDT

How convenient is that??
43 ms