I'd vote against a wiki myself.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #153,935

by Another Scott

5/5/04 7:11:16 PM

I'd vote against a wiki myself.

Every one I've come across has been rather sluggish to display pages and not at all intuitive to modify.

YMMV.

I'd go with Boxley's suggestion myself, and I actually do something similar at work (have a very simple web page with pointers to sections of .DOC, .XLS, .PPT, .PDF, etc., documents).

Cheers,
Scott.

From Word To Eternity - (pwhysall) - (12) - May 5, 2004, 03:36:35 PM EDT

Do you mind if the HTML is a pile of dung? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - May 5, 2004, 04:23:07 PM EDT

Re: Do you mind if the HTML is a pile of dung? - (pwhysall) - (2) - May 5, 2004, 04:26:21 PM EDT

I wrote a Python Word->HTML converter in Feb - (FuManChu) - May 5, 2004, 05:04:35 PM EDT

BTW, the larger app is available (wiki-like) -NT - (FuManChu) - May 5, 2004, 05:06:24 PM EDT

Seconded - (jbrabeck) - May 5, 2004, 04:26:35 PM EDT

different question - (boxley) - (3) - May 5, 2004, 04:50:20 PM EDT

That's certainly one approach. - (pwhysall) - (2) - May 5, 2004, 05:03:04 PM EDT

That's what a wiki is for, I wot. -NT - (admin) - (1) - May 5, 2004, 05:35:31 PM EDT

I'd vote against a wiki myself. - (Another Scott) - May 5, 2004, 07:11:16 PM EDT

It's a problem no matter how you slice it. - (Another Scott) - May 5, 2004, 08:56:13 PM EDT

Sharepoint? (ducks, runs) -NT - (altmann) - (1) - May 6, 2004, 04:04:40 AM EDT

That's not funny! - (Silverlock) - May 6, 2004, 09:26:28 AM EDT

iwethey.org

*SHUN*
179 ms