IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates

My point was that Taliban moving troops into civillian areas is a survival 'tactic' (of course its deplorable - that is a 'moral' judgement) as a tactic, if it works then it is a sound survival tactic if it means their troops survive. Remember that from a tactical perspective the US can easly wipe out their forces if they are in the open. Remember to that they don't have a conventional standing army - just citizens with guns, some of whom are full time fighters vs part-time. Most of the Arabs ran away within days of the Sept 11th attack (there are numerous reports on that). Most volunteerrs ariving are Pashtuns from Pakistan.

I am convinced that there is a substantial confusion between the morallity of actions & the tactical nature of the same actions. If we are talking morality we need to be clear thats what we are talking. I am sure we are in total agreement on the moral issue.

"I do not see the Taliban having, or securing by its actions, moral influence." - I understand your point but surely we would need to ask Afghans this question, not us ??? - we can't be expected to see anything but immorality in their very existance so surely we are biased. Even the quote you use says ... "By moral influence, I mean that which causes the people to be in harmony with their leaders, so that they will accompany them in life and unto death without fear of mortal peril." - now if the Afghan citizens agree with you, then what you say is correct.

Cheers

Doug


New Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates
Remember to that they don't have a conventional standing army - just citizens with guns, some of whom are full time fighters vs part-time. Most of the Arabs ran away within days of the Sept 11th attack (there are numerous reports on that). Most volunteerrs ariving are Pashtuns from Pakistan.

Last I heard, they had 40-60k men opposing the Northern Alliance.

That's not a bunch of guys on a weekend jaunt. They've got far more than just AKs. That's T-72s, heavy artillery, etc. That's a *lot* of logistical support required.

Al' Queda's has been widely reported as being the tough, dedicated, well-trained core of the Taliban troops, and that was a large part of OBL's power base. Train them well, let them fight, get experience, etc.

My point was that Taliban moving troops into civillian areas is a survival 'tactic' (of course its deplorable - that is a 'moral' judgement) as a tactic, if it works then it is a sound survival tactic if it means their troops survive.

If - if they don't care about the civilians.

Which I don't think that they do. So for your case to make sense, then they're not fighting for/defending the civilians. (what you're arguing they are/do, when they're proving otherwise)

Addison
New Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates
You're still debating this idiot? :=)

(idiot = gentle term.)
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
-- Donald Knuth
New Ah.. the unbiased-idiot report: thanks for clarifying
just Everything. Let me guess - you too only ever speak *facts*, so any counter to *those* ---> idiocy. (And naturally too - these are All of the 'facts' that are relevant. Because they are your-facts) Right?

I think I understand ar least a pair of you only-the-Facts, Maam presenters a bit better, now. (Hey I thought that Facts like that were found only in the Religion arena of Certainty; now you say there are Political-Facts too??

How do You spel s a n c t i m o n y ??


A.


0.pin.ion n

"1. a belief not based on absolute certainty or positive knowledge but on what seems true,valid, or probable to one's own mind; what one thinks; judgment."

Emphasis added, for the humility-impaired and the ever-Certain amongst us. Next we can look up simplistic.

Nahhhh. Never mind.
New Yes of course.
I am Mr. Factoid, you didn't know that? Every thing I speak is as if it were from the lips of Mohammed or God, and we know they are both truth incarnate.
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
-- Donald Knuth
     Taliban strength surprises Pentagon - (bluke) - (33)
         I dislike unnamed sources - (wharris2) - (10)
             Re: I am wary of the poisoning threat - (dmarker2)
             Kosovo conflict was won by precision bombing... - (Arkadiy)
             Re: I dislike unnamed sources - NOT unamed any more - (dmarker2) - (7)
                 Re: I dislike unnamed sources - NOT unamed any more - (addison) - (4)
                     Surprises are a given - (Ric Locke)
                     Re: I dislike unnamed sources - NOT unamed any more - (dmarker2) - (2)
                         Re: I dislike unnamed sources - NOT unamed any more - (addison) - (1)
                             Re: I dislike unnamed sources - NOT unamed any more - (dmarker2)
                 News sources my ascii - (wharris2) - (1)
                     Re: News sources my ascii - (dmarker2)
         Sun Tzu: Estimates - (kmself) - (21)
             Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates - (dmarker2) - (20)
                 Survival of who? - (addison) - (13)
                     Re: Survival of who? - (dmarker2) - (12)
                         Re: Survival of who? - (addison) - (11)
                             Re: Survival of who? - (dmarker2) - (6)
                                 In the same vein, - (addison) - (5)
                                     Re: In the same vein, - (dmarker2) - (4)
                                         Re: In the same vein, - (addison) - (3)
                                             Re: In the same vein, - (dmarker2) - (2)
                                                 Re: In the same vein, - (addison) - (1)
                                                     Heh.. last post - (Ashton)
                             hate to ruin a perfectly degenerating thread - (boxley) - (3)
                                 Re: hate to ruin a perfectly degenerating thread - (dmarker2) - (2)
                                     Distinction: 055 brigade vs Afghan soldiers - (brettj) - (1)
                                         links? proves? -NT - (boxley)
                 Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates - (kmself) - (5)
                     Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates - (dmarker2) - (4)
                         Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates - (addison) - (3)
                             Re: Sun Tzu: Estimates - (wharris2) - (2)
                                 Ah.. the unbiased-idiot report: thanks for clarifying - (Ashton) - (1)
                                     Yes of course. - (wharris2)

Is that a differential I see in my mirror?
624 ms