Post #152,702
4/26/04 10:02:46 PM
|
Opportunity declined, you're not my fucking type
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #152,727
4/27/04 10:05:18 AM
|
What about the horse he rode in on??? ;-)
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|
Post #152,761
4/27/04 2:07:49 PM
|
That's mare of a possibility
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #152,798
4/27/04 7:53:37 PM
|
Saddle up!
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|
Post #152,806
4/27/04 9:13:39 PM
|
My other car is a Lincoln.
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #152,813
4/27/04 9:34:22 PM
|
If it nae be Scottish, it be CRRRRRRAP!
|
Post #152,818
4/27/04 10:06:06 PM
|
I keep looking for the phrase,
"According to top Chinese and Russian scientists..."
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #152,834
4/28/04 2:10:20 AM
|
s/is a// :-)
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #152,814
4/27/04 9:39:36 PM
|
It's one thing to know they're coming...
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #152,819
4/27/04 10:06:37 PM
|
Absorbant and yellow and porous is he!
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #152,822
4/27/04 10:12:49 PM
|
Powered by the lights of perverted science!
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|