Yup.

Post #152,612 by Another Scott 4/26/04 9:52:55 AM Reply	Yup. Box did get the quote wrong, and you are correct. I was just having some fun. Just to help kill this thread, my final contribution will be [link\|http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/whatclintonsaid.htm\|this]: As you know, in a deposition in January, I was asked questions about my relationship with Monica Lewinsky. While my answers were legally accurate, I did not volunteer information. Indeed, I did have a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky that was not appropriate. In fact, it was wrong. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible. FWIW. Cheers, Scott.
Post #152,614 by mmoffitt 4/26/04 10:53:17 AM Reply	Understood. I was disappointed in him, but more disappointed in my government for pursuing this idiocy. I wish it would die, but it doesn't look like its going to. The Repo Trashers (Coulter, Rush, Liddy, that idiot from Fox - don't remember his name, etc.) still bring it up over and over and over. I guess that keeps their little minds off of the collosal failure their boy has been. :-) bcnu, Mikem
Post #152,618 by boxley 4/26/04 11:15:24 AM Reply	they prefer gravitas not grabbyass shrub's a poorly advized extremely bad decision maker with gravitas bill was a poorly advized halfassed decision maker with grabbyass and grabbyass gets more ratings. thanx, bill attempting to explain profiling doesn't require one to take a position for or against it any more than attempting to explain gravity requires one to be for or against gravity. Walter Williams questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]

Welcome to IWETHEY!