Post #150,999
4/13/04 10:59:27 AM
|

He's in the minority. What can he do?
|
Post #151,000
4/13/04 11:01:59 AM
|

Fuck off and have your pansy-ass civilised debate elsewhere.
This is Flames, remember?
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #151,003
4/13/04 11:07:47 AM
|

Ack! It burns! It burns! <crash, thud>
|
Post #151,006
4/13/04 11:15:58 AM
|

And fuck you to
Brits suck.
Grammer Nazis suk m0r.
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #151,007
4/13/04 11:18:48 AM
|

Fuck me to what?
Fucktard.
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #151,010
4/13/04 11:29:28 AM
|

See what I said about grammer nazis, fuckwit
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #151,011
4/13/04 11:31:55 AM
|

Deliberate spelling errors are so pass\ufffd, Ben.
Or maybe you really are a spacker.
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #151,012
4/13/04 11:40:42 AM
|

is a tard lower or higher than a wit?
"You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #151,079
4/13/04 7:38:48 PM
|

You can't handle subtlety
I prefer my arguments to build up into an explosion.
|
Post #151,086
4/13/04 8:00:38 PM
4/14/04 8:12:36 AM
|

Never Noticed that! *tic*
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!

Edited by folkert
April 14, 2004, 08:12:36 AM EDT
|
Post #151,092
4/13/04 8:47:17 PM
|

As I recall, you were the grenade...
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #151,131
4/14/04 8:13:05 AM
|

Ummm, yeah. I know.
And I still like to fight with him :)
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #151,229
4/15/04 8:35:37 AM
|

I was the finger on your pin.
|