IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Needs clarification
Post #149,856
by tuberculosis
Picture of tuberculosis
4/2/04 9:26:53 PM
8/21/07 6:40:20 AM
Reply
New Needs clarification
Natural person extends to artificially fertilized embryos? Pre-birth fetus's? Person remains fuzzy at present and getting fuzzier as the Anti abortionists continue to push their controlling agenda - which would appear to violate Thane's article 2 except they will invoke protection of unborn persons as justification for meddling.


Java is a joke, only it's not funny.

     --Alan Lovejoy
Collapse Edited by tuberculosis Aug. 21, 2007, 06:40:20 AM EDT
Needs clarification
Natural person extends to artificially fertilized embryos? Pre-birth fetus's? Person remains fuzzy at present and getting fuzzier as the Anti abortionists continue to push their controlling agenda - which would appear to violate Thane's article 2 except they will invoke protection of unborn persons as justification for meddling.


Java is a joke, only it's not funny.

     --Alan Lovejoy
Collapse All History
     Defining the "next" constitution. - (inthane-chan) - (37) - April 2, 2004, 04:07:40 PM EST
         "is not a living, self-aware organism" ... coma? - (drewk) - (11) - April 2, 2004, 03:05:56 PM EST
             If you've got better verbiage, I'm all ears. - (inthane-chan) - (10) - April 2, 2004, 03:11:41 PM EST
                 How about - (jbrabeck) - (6) - April 2, 2004, 03:43:58 PM EST
                     Artificail life? Alien life? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (3) - April 2, 2004, 03:51:15 PM EST
                         Re: Artificail life? Alien life? - (jb4) - (2) - April 2, 2004, 06:06:54 PM EST
                             I think granting them the rights of citizens... - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 06:12:25 PM EST
                             But when they are made/found - (Arkadiy) - April 3, 2004, 12:43:46 PM EST
                     Re: How about.. don't forget my cats - (xtensive) - (1) - April 2, 2004, 04:42:43 PM EST
                         That's a long limb, alright. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 04:56:17 PM EST
                 Current legal standard is "natural person" - (drewk) - (2) - April 2, 2004, 03:59:00 PM EST
                     Thanks, incorporated. -NT - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 04:09:19 PM EST
                     Needs clarification - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:40:20 AM EDT
         I have problems with your use of "truth" - (Arkadiy) - (1) - April 2, 2004, 03:39:23 PM EST
             Freedom of religion. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 04:08:41 PM EST
         Re: Defining the "next" constitution. - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - April 2, 2004, 05:53:52 PM EST
             on your post right to assemble and seek redress from the gov - (boxley) - April 2, 2004, 06:15:18 PM EST
             Good food for thought. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 06:16:36 PM EST
         Re: Defining the "next" constitution. - (jb4) - (1) - April 2, 2004, 06:05:37 PM EST
             Re: Defining the "next" constitution. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 06:18:02 PM EST
         Give it a shot - (boxley) - April 2, 2004, 06:32:55 PM EST
         Another thing to consider as a source - the UDHR. - (Another Scott) - (16) - April 2, 2004, 11:09:17 PM EST
             total disagreement on a few things - (boxley) - (15) - April 2, 2004, 11:27:34 PM EST
                 Re: total disagreement on a few things - (JayMehaffey) - (14) - April 3, 2004, 01:16:37 AM EST
                     that is not a basic function of states - (boxley) - (13) - April 3, 2004, 07:27:15 AM EST
                         The basic function of states . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - April 3, 2004, 10:20:41 AM EST
                         Re: that is not a basic function of states - (JayMehaffey) - (10) - April 3, 2004, 01:54:38 PM EST
                             what the state is better doing? - (boxley) - (1) - April 3, 2004, 08:47:38 PM EST
                                 US doesn't do it very well - (JayMehaffey) - April 4, 2004, 12:20:27 AM EST
                             Actually, it is... - (danreck) - (7) - April 5, 2004, 04:33:12 PM EDT
                                 Confucius said it better - (Ashton) - April 5, 2004, 05:28:23 PM EDT
                                 Not sure what your point is - (JayMehaffey) - (5) - April 5, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EDT
                                     why should government cover health care? -NT - (boxley) - (4) - April 5, 2004, 06:06:00 PM EDT
                                         Why should business 'cover' health care? - (Ashton) - (1) - April 5, 2004, 07:40:43 PM EDT
                                             Lets start a new thread, free medical care for all or not (new thread) - (boxley) - April 5, 2004, 09:44:30 PM EDT
                                         Things to consider - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - April 5, 2004, 09:37:12 PM EDT
                                             Have you visited a VA hospital or IHS clinic lately? -NT - (boxley) - April 5, 2004, 09:45:36 PM EDT
                         Re: that is not a basic function of states - (Ashton) - April 4, 2004, 01:32:10 AM EST

Well, the place was crowded. We were packed in like sardines. They were all there to listen to the Big Band sounds of Tommy Dorsal. What sole! Tommy was rocking the place with a very popular tuna: "Sal-mon Chanted Evening," and the stage was surrounded by screaming groupers; probably there to see the bass player.
60 ms