IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 1
active user
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
I think granting them the rights of citizens...
Post #149,844
by
inthane-chan
4/2/04 6:12:25 PM
Reply
I think granting them the rights of citizens...
...decreases the chances of them being made. Why expend effort in creating an AI/whatever if you can't own it as your personal slave?
Nobody wins in a butter eating contest
Defining the "next" constitution.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (37)
- April 2, 2004, 04:07:40 PM EST
"is not a living, self-aware organism" ... coma?
- (
drewk
)
- (11)
- April 2, 2004, 03:05:56 PM EST
If you've got better verbiage, I'm all ears.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (10)
- April 2, 2004, 03:11:41 PM EST
How about
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (6)
- April 2, 2004, 03:43:58 PM EST
Artificail life? Alien life?
-NT
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (3)
- April 2, 2004, 03:51:15 PM EST
Re: Artificail life? Alien life?
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- April 2, 2004, 06:06:54 PM EST
I think granting them the rights of citizens...
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 2, 2004, 06:12:25 PM EST
But when they are made/found
- (
Arkadiy
)
- April 3, 2004, 12:43:46 PM EST
Re: How about.. don't forget my cats
- (
xtensive
)
- (1)
- April 2, 2004, 04:42:43 PM EST
That's a long limb, alright.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 2, 2004, 04:56:17 PM EST
Current legal standard is "natural person"
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- April 2, 2004, 03:59:00 PM EST
Thanks, incorporated.
-NT
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 2, 2004, 04:09:19 PM EST
Needs clarification
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:40:20 AM EDT
I have problems with your use of "truth"
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- April 2, 2004, 03:39:23 PM EST
Freedom of religion.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 2, 2004, 04:08:41 PM EST
Re: Defining the "next" constitution.
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (2)
- April 2, 2004, 05:53:52 PM EST
on your post right to assemble and seek redress from the gov
- (
boxley
)
- April 2, 2004, 06:15:18 PM EST
Good food for thought.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 2, 2004, 06:16:36 PM EST
Re: Defining the "next" constitution.
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- April 2, 2004, 06:05:37 PM EST
Re: Defining the "next" constitution.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 2, 2004, 06:18:02 PM EST
Give it a shot
- (
boxley
)
- April 2, 2004, 06:32:55 PM EST
Another thing to consider as a source - the UDHR.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (16)
- April 2, 2004, 11:09:17 PM EST
total disagreement on a few things
- (
boxley
)
- (15)
- April 2, 2004, 11:27:34 PM EST
Re: total disagreement on a few things
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (14)
- April 3, 2004, 01:16:37 AM EST
that is not a basic function of states
- (
boxley
)
- (13)
- April 3, 2004, 07:27:15 AM EST
The basic function of states . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- April 3, 2004, 10:20:41 AM EST
Re: that is not a basic function of states
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (10)
- April 3, 2004, 01:54:38 PM EST
what the state is better doing?
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- April 3, 2004, 08:47:38 PM EST
US doesn't do it very well
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- April 4, 2004, 12:20:27 AM EST
Actually, it is...
- (
danreck
)
- (7)
- April 5, 2004, 04:33:12 PM EDT
Confucius said it better
- (
Ashton
)
- April 5, 2004, 05:28:23 PM EDT
Not sure what your point is
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (5)
- April 5, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EDT
why should government cover health care?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- April 5, 2004, 06:06:00 PM EDT
Why should business 'cover' health care?
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- April 5, 2004, 07:40:43 PM EDT
Lets start a new thread, free medical care for all or not (new thread)
- (
boxley
)
- April 5, 2004, 09:44:30 PM EDT
Things to consider
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- April 5, 2004, 09:37:12 PM EDT
Have you visited a VA hospital or IHS clinic lately?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- April 5, 2004, 09:45:36 PM EDT
Re: that is not a basic function of states
- (
Ashton
)
- April 4, 2004, 01:32:10 AM EST
i
we
they
.org
Absorbant and yellow and porous is he!
53 ms