If you define RAD as usable

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #147,649

by boxley

3/22/04 9:33:13 PM

If you define RAD as usable

then it was 95 before MS had anything barely useful and that was access. Paradox was useful long before that.
thanx,
bill

"You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

That reminds me... - (CRConrad) - (21) - March 19, 2004, 05:36:41 PM EST

Re: That reminds me... - (deSitter) - (20) - March 19, 2004, 09:20:22 PM EST

And many of the ideas for Borland - (ChrisR) - March 19, 2004, 09:43:33 PM EST

Drag-and-drop a few components, set a few properties, and... - (CRConrad) - (18) - March 21, 2004, 04:48:24 PM EST

Wrong on Paradox - (boxley) - (16) - March 21, 2004, 05:48:55 PM EST

Paradox -for Windows- != Paradox. PfW published ~199...4? -NT - (CRConrad) - (9) - March 21, 2004, 05:54:02 PM EST

Janvier 1993 - (altmann) - March 21, 2004, 06:00:40 PM EST

History of Visual Basic - (boxley) - (7) - March 21, 2004, 06:51:33 PM EST

A "history" devoid of dates. So: When was VB v. 1 released? - (CRConrad) - (5) - March 21, 2004, 07:15:30 PM EST

VB 1 was a dos product was it not? I thought VB for windows - (boxley) - (4) - March 21, 2004, 07:22:06 PM EST

Thats Quick Basic - VB 1.x was around 1993 - (deSitter) - (3) - March 21, 2004, 08:46:50 PM EST

That's all well and good... But it wasn't a RAD IDE. - (CRConrad) - (2) - March 22, 2004, 05:00:45 AM EST

Re: That's all well and good... But it wasn't a RAD IDE. - (deSitter) - March 22, 2004, 09:13:52 PM EST

If you define RAD as usable - (boxley) - March 22, 2004, 09:33:13 PM EST

More history. - (a6l6e6x) - March 21, 2004, 08:48:28 PM EST

FoxPro clone of Paradox? - (Arkadiy) - (5) - March 23, 2004, 10:46:04 AM EST

Re: FoxPro clone of Paradox? - (deSitter) - (2) - March 23, 2004, 10:52:25 AM EST

I worked with DOS FoxPro - (Arkadiy) - (1) - March 23, 2004, 10:56:17 AM EST

Re: I worked with DOS FoxPro - (deSitter) - March 23, 2004, 11:01:49 AM EST

spent a lot of time with Foxpro 2.0 - (boxley) - (1) - March 23, 2004, 11:20:32 AM EST

Flakey indeed - (Arkadiy) - March 23, 2004, 03:39:11 PM EST

DevGuide for OpenWindows 2 - (pwhysall) - March 22, 2004, 07:27:11 AM EST

iwethey.org

Latex abuse... what did I walk in on??
40 ms