Post #14,633
10/22/01 3:34:52 PM
|
How can you be clear?
In a sense, laws are to take away some of the grayness. If I have any complaint about the last twenty years in American culture - it is the rise of anti-intellectual relativism... Another topic for another time, though.
I recently got the "chance" to execute a "living will" with my terminally ill father. He wished to die if his cancer got any worse... From a purely cynical side, the medical community kept him alive (and here's the real slippery slope from my vantage point - the perfect patient - the terminally ill, INSURED elderly patients - you can't really be sued for malpractice even if you dance on their graves...) for as long as they could. When their was no more real money to be made (cause he wasn't strong enough for any more expensive drugs/radiation), they "allowed" us to let him die.
Who in the hell are the politicians to tell me when, how, etc... I die. It's my choice. It's the one sure fucking thing we all have when we're born. The "right" to die and pay taxes...
A lot of these "slippery slopes" are so much bullshit to anyone with real personal experience. Since when has this or any other government really given a shit about the sanctity of life other than to build the standing ranks of its armies? There's some sanctity for us!
I'm writing under your post 'cause I figured you might understand what I'm talking about. Maybe Malraux too... he just seems to have worked out all of the gray areas...
Just a few thoughts,
Screamer The Other Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
"God is dead" Nietzsche
"Nietzsche is dead" God
"Nietzsche has an S in it" Celina Jones
"Life is but a walking Stratocaster"
|
Post #14,701
10/22/01 10:09:47 PM
|
Way OT...
"Life is but a walking Stratocaster" then how come they still call it a "running bass line"?
jb4 (Resistance is not futile...)
|
Post #14,810
10/23/01 3:31:48 PM
|
There are "walking" bass lines too...
and if I had put "SG" in there, it would have become obtuse... Play get R...
Just a few thoughts,
Screamer
"Nietzsche has an S in it" Celina Jones
"Life is but a running Telecaster"
|
Post #14,813
10/23/01 4:30:16 PM
|
Thanks for your comments.
I'm sorry your father is so ill. I'm sure it's been a terrible time for you and your family. :-(
I think I understand where you're coming from. I agree that personal experiences can be very important in framing one's view on death-and-dying issues. My view is we need to protect helpless people from those who would seek to hasten their death against their wishes, but we also need to have ways to allow people to end prolonged, pointless suffering, if that is their wish.
(This is just my opinion - I'm not interested in debating it at this time.)
Best wishes, Scott.
|
Post #14,826
10/23/01 6:07:57 PM
|
All is good...
My father passed away in January. I've had time to reflect. The Bruce Hornsby/Don Henley song "End of the Innocence" keeps playing in the background of my thoughts...
My point was really for Marlowe, which is that there really isn't a slippery slope. There is an intellectual problem (such as the abortion issue or drugs), with determining "who decides" what's in the best interest of an individual. i.e. When a family member is dying a slow and agonizing death, that member has requested that when they can no longer take care of themselves and there is no hope for survival to have the decency and respect to euthanize them... And you can't... Your doctor or the State have the final word. Oh, you can, but you will be charged with some form of manslaughter... at least in Ohio. This issue is no slippery slope. The laws as written are wrong. Anyone who has actually dealt with this situation intuits this. If they changed these laws, I don't see how this slippery slope would lead to the wholesale slaughter of psychotics in mental instituitions, etc... If the law is worded carefully...
Beyond the hollow political rhetoric, there is a truly intellectual divergence that good folks can disagree about. I understood the points that both of you were expressing and kind of agree, at least in principal with both (other than the barbs).
The problem with many of these "topics" is "as you get older, less theory is involved and they, unfortunately, become real life experiences. In other words, theory becomes superceded in many cases. I believe that Marlowe and I are about the same age (not that that's truly pertinent in this context) and I understood what he was getting at. With Marlowe's political tirade, I have to say that I felt he quite eloquently described the frustration that he felt with the political and legal system. He went too far... He exagerrated - actually puffery is the correct term I think - and you called him out on it. To say we are a "culture of death" is a vast oversimplification and simply not true. Where is Jack Kevorkian right now? But this in no way negates a large percentage of what Marlowe was saying... now quit calling eachother names and get on with the debate.
Just a few thoughts,
Screamer
"The he/she/it that cannot decide on a tagline"
|
Post #14,833
10/23/01 6:44:32 PM
|
Nicely summarized, from my POV too
It may even be compared to a sort of 'states rights' VS Feds only: individual rights VS ALL - this re. the question, who is best qualified to know intimately, the wishes of a single human in extremis?
*ANY* authority figure? or - just about anyone else, with unarguable* emotional / family ties to the person involved. This goes across the above issues as well as abortion and the same "ownership of one's own body" OVER all other artificial theoretical codifications.
* Nothing *is* 'unarguable' of course, such as we are: a society with 10x the number of attorneys than engineers (and that's dropping - for Biz-AD courses). So some sort of qualifying thought is evidently required - to claim this status - but 'status' it is, however evasive of a nice slogan to define it.
Current laws indeed suck, but I'm not sure we possess the remaining means for countering terabytes of legal precedents - VS what was once deemed 'common sense'. In that last - we are all in trouble, not just the dying, today.
Ashton
|
Post #14,875
10/23/01 11:32:13 PM
|
Now I'm getting depressed
10X the lawyers to engineers... and more lawyers in the wings. Where did you come across that stat. I'd like to use it in many of my own tirades/educational pursuits. And some people wonder why this country is the way it is...
Personal aside... The Celina Jones thing can be found in the Monty Python's "The Meaning of Life", section - "Middle Age".
Just a few thoughts,
Screamer
"I'll tip my hat to the new constitution, take a bow for the new revolution, smile and grin at the change all around, pick up my guitar and play, just like yesterday..."
P. Townshend
"Nietzsche has an S in it" Celina Jones
|
Post #14,901
10/24/01 2:51:14 AM
|
Datum is a couple years old
and it was part of a comparison of US culture and Japanese. The corollary to the lawyer/engineer ratio in US is - in Japan it's the reverse! 10:1 engineers over lawyers. :[
Perhaps our hope is.. a more Japanese America? :-\ufffd
I tend to believe in momentum, since physics has worked every time I've tested it. The intertwined groups from lawyers to all manner of Authority figures, combined with general ennui, disinterest in civic matters except by radical groups who exploit the situation - suggests we have the turning radius of the Titanic and.. icebergs are dead ahead.
Besides, far ahead of all the disinterested 2-worker-family consumers are - the miniscule group with the funds to perpetuate their hegemony. These certainly buy enough of those surplus lawyers to stay in control. They know where to spend funds for er 'insurance' (RIAA, Disney, SSSCA, HMOs to cut Corp costs, anyone ??) and they already have in their black books: precisely which congressman to fund for which loophole needing tightening or loosening.
Overlay the stark fact of net-worth distribution with: ownership of the media - and its increasing mergers into perhaps two giant Corps (?) and the 24/7 invention of new propaganda, TLAs, spin from the various flaks .. We already qualify for inclusion in that Dystopia anthology I've been reading. The inane infotainment keeps 'em barefoot and pregnant (and away from asking questions). Since nobody much has free energy for organizing, opposing this mega-Titanic:
My guess is that momentum wins, just as in physics. Until a giant Shock occurs! As only the future can.. *surprise*. Meanwhile, yes: it IS depressing. The money is on the Ballmers and their adoring acolytes the MBAs (who wannabe just Like the Winners. Natch.) Fuck the loosers - now That's the Murican Way, is it not? Win! or yer dead meat.
Oh well - in a hundred years there may be all new people - umm, unless they're just like their parents [!!]
Damn, now I'm depressed. Zappa was Right again.
A.
|
Post #14,951
10/24/01 11:29:29 AM
|
And that's why I too will be moving
to Montana soon... gonna be a mental toss flycoon.... Yippee Aye Oh Aye Ayeeeeay.
:-P
Just a few thoughts,
Screamer
"I'll tip my hat to the new constitution, take a bow for the new revolution, smile and grin at the change all around, pick up my guitar and play, just like yesterday..."
P. Townshend
"Nietzsche has an S in it" Celina Jones
|
Post #15,198
10/26/01 1:01:37 AM
|
Dunno if that's far enough away from epicenter (?)
But then.. I have no idea how I'd even go about choosing a relocation. (Even though the universe is portable - - all inside head).
Inertia. Still quiet enough nearby - and if the terminal weirdness surfaces, there is only one thing to do: get a good ringside seat, bring friend, potables and take it all in.
(I don't qualify fer rapturin out, but then.. who'd wanna hang-out with them as do?)
A.
|