Bruce Eckel on Java's generics - (ben_tilly) - (14) - March 13, 2004, 01:20:50 AM EST
         ObAPL plug - (deSitter) - March 13, 2004, 01:37:13 AM EST
         I enjoyed the follow-up more :) - (FuManChu) - March 13, 2004, 01:28:39 PM EST
         They're mostly about eliminating casting in collections - (tuberculosis) - (11) - March 13, 2004, 10:28:52 PM EST
             as a non jhead or any recent programmer - (boxley) - (1) - March 13, 2004, 10:53:17 PM EST
                 Sure - Ever tried BeanShell? - (tuberculosis) - March 14, 2004, 01:17:09 AM EST
             That was pretty much Bruce Eckel's point of view - (ben_tilly) - (7) - March 13, 2004, 10:58:04 PM EST
                 B&D is simpler - why complicate? - (deSitter) - (5) - March 13, 2004, 11:34:58 PM EST
                     Why isn't Forth ideal? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - March 14, 2004, 01:38:40 AM EST
                         Re: Why isn't Forth ideal? - (deSitter) - (1) - March 14, 2004, 01:53:38 AM EST
                             Yes, but never from those who designed it. ;) -NT - (FuManChu) - March 14, 2004, 10:28:57 AM EST
                     Bondage & Discipline? -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1) - March 14, 2004, 02:10:21 PM EST
                         Yes, it's stupid vacuous X-speak - (deSitter) - March 14, 2004, 11:17:02 PM EST
                 Yes - he no longer "Thinks in Java" - (tuberculosis) - March 14, 2004, 01:20:52 AM EST
             The real way to do generics would have been ... - (bluke) - March 14, 2004, 12:31:41 PM EST