120. But then, I'm better than you lot.

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #136,626 by pwhysall 1/20/04 7:26:09 AM Reply	120. But then, I'm better than you lot. I just wish the scale went past 120, so that you might begin to understand the scale of my egomania. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home Page - Now with added Zing!]
Post #136,632 by slugbug 1/20/04 8:36:31 AM Reply	chuckle
Post #136,779 by broomberg 1/20/04 9:16:28 PM Reply	55. "Occasional" but I disagree. I think I'm far more narcissistic than it test. It really seems to pull unsure, unconfident narcissists. I'm SURE I'm smarter than most people, so their compliments are meaningless. And I never abuse waitstaff, they can get you back and you don't even know it, that is just plain stupid. My time is more important than most, but not as important as my boss'. I know where I fall on the hierchy. Sure, I'll dwell enviously for a bit, but why bother obsessing, I'm better than them anyway so they are not worse the effort.. And on, and on, and on. Crappy test.

Are You a Narcissist? - (orion) - (22) - Jan. 20, 2004, 12:15:23 AM EST

I'm joining an isolation tank club -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 20, 2004, 12:20:33 AM EST

You lied on the test - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Jan. 20, 2004, 12:47:20 AM EST

I chose what I thought was right - (orion) - (10) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:13:21 AM EST

You may not remember, but I do - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Jan. 20, 2004, 02:03:08 AM EST

Ive met Norm, he is not a preener - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:32:31 PM EST

At least it is some defence - (orion) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:40:51 PM EST

As a recommendation, then... - (bepatient) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:48:32 PM EST

I dissagree - (orion) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:54:41 PM EST

Making those changes, he scores 70 - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2004, 02:26:45 PM EST

What a difference that makes - (orion) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 04:13:26 PM EST

Grasping at small straws are we? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 11:30:52 AM EST

I get out of it what I can - (orion) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:04:40 PM EST

That is one then - (orion) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:49:02 PM EST

It's not a good test. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2004, 03:39:22 AM EST

Right. Now if one of the questions was - (hnick) - Jan. 20, 2004, 07:48:14 AM EST

120. But then, I'm better than you lot. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 07:26:09 AM EST

*chuckle* -NT - (slugbug) - Jan. 20, 2004, 08:36:31 AM EST

55. "Occasional" but I disagree. - (broomberg) - Jan. 20, 2004, 09:16:28 PM EST

LRPD says: Yes, m'lord. -NT - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2004, 08:19:40 AM EST

Heh - new .sig, Ark...? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 08:33:14 AM EST

ObSentientLRPD: Can you stand the excitement? -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 20, 2004, 10:47:42 AM EST

Faith-based IT -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 20, 2004, 11:00:40 AM EST

It's like dingos mating with elephants: messy loud with lots of snapping and position changes.
56 ms