IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / It's not a good test.
Post #136,622
by Andrew Grygus
Picture of Andrew Grygus
1/20/04 3:39:22 AM
Reply
New It's not a good test.
How the answers will influence the outcome is just too obvious.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
Post #136,628
by hnick
1/20/04 7:48:14 AM
Reply
New Right. Now if one of the questions was
"Did you cheat on any of the answers? Add 20 points per cheat"
you might see some accurate results.
But only if you don't cheat on that one...
never mind...
     Are You a Narcissist? - (orion) - (22) - Jan. 20, 2004, 12:15:23 AM EST
         I'm joining an isolation tank club -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 20, 2004, 12:20:33 AM EST
         You lied on the test - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Jan. 20, 2004, 12:47:20 AM EST
             I chose what I thought was right - (orion) - (10) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:13:21 AM EST
                 You may not remember, but I do - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Jan. 20, 2004, 02:03:08 AM EST
                     Ive met Norm, he is not a preener - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:32:31 PM EST
                         At least it is some defence - (orion) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:40:51 PM EST
                             As a recommendation, then... - (bepatient) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:48:32 PM EST
                                 I dissagree - (orion) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:54:41 PM EST
                         Making those changes, he scores 70 - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2004, 02:26:45 PM EST
                             What a difference that makes - (orion) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 04:13:26 PM EST
                                 Grasping at small straws are we? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 11:30:52 AM EST
                                     I get out of it what I can - (orion) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:04:40 PM EST
                     That is one then - (orion) - Jan. 20, 2004, 01:49:02 PM EST
         It's not a good test. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2004, 03:39:22 AM EST
             Right. Now if one of the questions was - (hnick) - Jan. 20, 2004, 07:48:14 AM EST
         120. But then, I'm better than you lot. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 07:26:09 AM EST
             *chuckle* -NT - (slugbug) - Jan. 20, 2004, 08:36:31 AM EST
             55. "Occasional" but I disagree. - (broomberg) - Jan. 20, 2004, 09:16:28 PM EST
         LRPD says: Yes, m'lord. -NT - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Jan. 20, 2004, 08:19:40 AM EST
             Heh - new .sig, Ark...? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2004, 08:33:14 AM EST
                 ObSentientLRPD: Can you stand the excitement? -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 20, 2004, 10:47:42 AM EST
                 Faith-based IT -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 20, 2004, 11:00:40 AM EST

Surreptitious semblances scamper surrealistically, strewing scabrous solecisms, simpering sophistry - striving sententiously - still, scintillating serendipity seems South. Zymotic, yellowish xeroxed vellums unsatisfactorily trumpet simple rationales: querulous ponderings of nebulous musings. Let knaves justly invoke hoary genuflection, for early doth craven biliousness atrophy.
48 ms