No it isn't.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #133,354

by bepatient

1/3/04 12:08:36 AM

No it isn't.

You don't like what they're saying.

For the record, neither do I.

However, they have every right guaranteed to them by the Constitution to believe what they will and to share that belief with others.

Just because it happens on government land doesn't mean shit.

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition}

It goes in, it must come out._{Teslacle's Deviant to Fudd's Law}

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]

New faith based park programs - (JayMehaffey) - (41) - Jan. 2, 2004, 03:03:11 AM EST

Re: New faith based park programs - (deSitter) - Jan. 2, 2004, 09:17:50 AM EST

Dennett on this sort of codswallop - (rcareaga) - (2) - Jan. 2, 2004, 03:28:04 PM EST

Amen to that! Read my Thomas Jefferson sig. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 2, 2004, 02:50:27 PM EST

Jon Carroll chimes in - (deSitter) - Jan. 5, 2004, 12:44:41 AM EST

That's disgusting -NT - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 2, 2004, 11:21:44 AM EST

A better question: - (Arkadiy) - (26) - Jan. 2, 2004, 11:55:01 AM EST

I'm not sure they are - (JayMehaffey) - (23) - Jan. 2, 2004, 12:52:38 PM EST

In other words... - (bepatient) - (22) - Jan. 2, 2004, 09:30:06 PM EST

Re: In other words... - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 2, 2004, 09:34:56 PM EST

No it isn't. - (bepatient) - Jan. 3, 2004, 12:08:36 AM EST

Codswallop - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 2, 2004, 11:56:02 PM EST

And should we support...? - (ben_tilly) - (18) - Jan. 3, 2004, 06:49:59 PM EST

If there is limitation of speech here... - (bepatient) - (17) - Jan. 3, 2004, 10:49:21 PM EST

There is - (ben_tilly) - (16) - Jan. 3, 2004, 11:02:46 PM EST

I don't think they're selling... - (bepatient) - (15) - Jan. 4, 2004, 02:33:51 PM EST

How do you not see the necessity? - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Jan. 4, 2004, 02:49:23 PM EST

I don't. - (bepatient) - (8) - Jan. 4, 2004, 05:19:35 PM EST

All hail GMS! :-> -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 4, 2004, 05:21:19 PM EST

Yeah, we can't have that, can we? - (CRConrad) - (6) - Jan. 4, 2004, 05:25:25 PM EST

Perhaps "the intellectual Market will correct..?" -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 4, 2004, 06:02:41 PM EST

Not really - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 4, 2004, 06:14:04 PM EST

Yes, really. - (CRConrad) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2004, 06:29:50 PM EST

Re: Yes, really. - (bepatient) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2004, 10:34:55 PM EST

I quite agree. - (static) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2004, 12:23:49 AM EST

and thus: Any Old Words at All, eh? --- ad infinitum. -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 5, 2004, 07:37:19 PM EST

your basis of argument is invalid - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2004, 08:34:32 PM EST

I detect more than a little bias against rangers -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2004, 09:09:43 PM EST

ya think :-) -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 5, 2004, 09:41:09 AM EST

What he said - doubled... -NT - (danreck) - Jan. 5, 2004, 03:28:10 PM EST

Re: dark side of freedom - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 4, 2004, 04:17:07 PM EST

Re: A better question: - (deSitter) - Jan. 2, 2004, 12:54:56 PM EST

Many parks have to raise at least part of their funding... - (Another Scott) - Jan. 2, 2004, 01:14:42 PM EST

Everyone's walking on coals. - (static) - (7) - Jan. 2, 2004, 08:42:24 PM EST

Re: Everyone's walking on coals. - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 2, 2004, 08:49:31 PM EST

You see, that's *exactly* what I was talking about. -NT - (static) - (3) - Jan. 2, 2004, 08:53:16 PM EST

Religion should stay out of science and v.v. - (deSitter) - Jan. 2, 2004, 09:04:59 PM EST

Take this to Religion if it goes any further, please. -NT - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 2, 2004, 09:02:27 PM EST

No intention of taking it any further. -NT - (static) - Jan. 2, 2004, 09:12:53 PM EST

I won't walk on coals about that (new thread) - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 3, 2004, 06:59:07 PM EST

In other words (Ben is such a wuss)... (new thread) - (CRConrad) - Jan. 4, 2004, 05:19:51 PM EST

I'm getting on the "Faith Based" bandwagon - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 6, 2004, 05:32:14 AM EST

iwethey.org

Opportunities are rarely good news.
66 ms