Hey, we've already got the code for that.

Post #125,349 by pwhysall 11/12/03 1:21:35 PM Reply	Hey, we've already got the code for that. Hey, we're thoroughly modern people here. Code re-use! [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=64921\|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=64921] Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #125,376 by rcareaga 11/12/03 2:56:40 PM 11/12/03 2:58:12 PM Reply	I had in mind more of a rigorously-observed policy of non-response. True, one wants to respond to some of the stratospheric imbecilities, the ludicrous misstatements...but content is immaterial to the creature; it requires only the fact of a response, even an automated response, for sustenance. Starve it. Not so much as a one-syllable word. cordially, [edit:clarification] Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist. Edited by rcareaga Nov. 12, 2003, 02:58:12 PM EST Expand All History
Post #125,380 by pwhysall 11/12/03 3:30:46 PM Reply	I concur. My previous response to its gut-wrenchingly offensive post is my last to it. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #125,383 by deSitter 11/12/03 3:41:05 PM Reply	One exception if "it" chooses to abandon anonymity. This latter is what really peeves me - I don't care how stupid or mean-spirited "it" wants to be, as long as "it" is an identifiable person. -drl
Post #125,533 by dmarker 11/13/03 4:28:57 PM Reply	That has also been my biggest issue And am in agreement re shun - been practicing it for a while. I had come to realise that by using bitter sarcasm, had been more or less deflecting from the imbecility of its goals & content. Doug M (PS am also offering a long overdue appology for using attack tactics re it, that appear to have done more harm than good)

Welcome to IWETHEY!