IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why Microsoft wants Google.
[link|http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12603|The Inquirer].

Microsoft really, really wants Google. It wants Google for one reason, namely, to strip it naked and to castrate it. Microsoft wants to put an end to people being able to use the power of Google, especially as to the way that we all can use Google as a tool which makes the Internet particularly useful in helping us all to get through our days without depending on Microsoft.

Here's an exercise for all to try. Search Google for Linux Windows That gets you about 14 million pages, even with the English preference or filter turned on. Now, got to msn.com and search the Microsoft way for the same two words. You get exactly 18 pages. The word censorship doesn't seem to do justice to what Microsoft has done to a msn user who wants to compare Linux with Windows, does it?

[...]


Makes sense.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: Why Microsoft wants Google.
I wish I knew something about search engines - time's ripe for a competitor that is incorruptible.
-drl
New I went to Advanced Search
I think that by default they search their "directory", although it's not mentioned anywhere.

If you specify a domain suffix, it goes to search that domain:

Results 1-15 of about 3606709 containing "linux windows"
--

The rich, as usual, are employing the elected.
-- [link|http://unfit2print.blogspot.com/|http://unfit2print.blogspot.com/]
New "No, we haven't removed that feature"
We just make it no longer the default. Because nobody ever changes their defaults.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Not quite
Site search is like this:

"Foo bar baz site:quux.com"

Search results will be restricted to quux.com


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Even more simple.
They don't want to kill it because of its search methods or some desire to filter "bad windows content"...they want it or want it dead (either way) to give them a better shot at being your first step into the net.

How many here have google set as home page or within one very short click of home (I use my own home page...google included at the top.

And on my windows pcs its ever worse...I have my home page as home >and< use the google toolbar on IE.

They don't want to share entry points to the net. MS wants to own them.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New As an item of curiosity . .
. . msn directs far more search users to [link|http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html|2003 and Beyond] than any of the other search engines - almost as many as the rest combined.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New A guess: The wording you happened to choose for your title..
...coincides with either A) "Hot" words in the MSN search algorithm, or B) What 'power'[*] users of MS stuff see as "forward-looking statements of direction" (i.e, MS marketing-speak about upcoming attractions), which is exactly what this type of [l]user can be reasonably expected to be looking for, thus making the link much more likely to be clicked on when returned by a search on that site than on any other search engine.


[*]: In irony-quote-marks for several reasons; perhaps mainly because, they're running their search for hard facts on MS's future direction on an *MS* site?!?


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Resident [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=119792|zIWETHEY pilkunnussija]
New Another factor would be . .
. . the number of times the words "Microsoft", "Longhorn" and "2003" appear in the text. The fact that hits from msn are so high says to me they are giving heavy preference to pages including these words. So much for impartial searches from msn.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     Why Microsoft wants Google. - (Another Scott) - (8)
         Re: Why Microsoft wants Google. - (deSitter)
         I went to Advanced Search - (Arkadiy) - (2)
             "No, we haven't removed that feature" - (drewk)
             Not quite - (pwhysall)
         Even more simple. - (bepatient)
         As an item of curiosity . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
             A guess: The wording you happened to choose for your title.. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                 Another factor would be . . - (Andrew Grygus)

You're gonna look like a right plank with that thing held against your face.
45 ms