IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New More importantly...
When you calculate the value of those jobs on the Chinese scale, meaning that the "value" of the jobs is what a Chinaman would take, then they probably DO account for 0.1 %. However, if a Chinaman makes 1/20 of what an American would make (.50 an hour vs $10), then the value of the jobs in American money is 2% (which might just be really close to reality).

I'll bet he's pricing the value at the Chinaman's wages, not the American.

The loss to the economy is the difference between the American wage and the Chinaman's. And a significant percentage is even Social Security and Income Tax. Bad for America, bad for retirees.

Collapse Edited by gdaustin Nov. 7, 2003, 09:16:51 PM EST
More importantly...
When you calculate the value of those jobs on the Chinese scale, meaning that the "value" of the jobs is what a Chinaman would take, then they probably DO account for 0.1 %. However, if a Chinaman makes 1/20 of what an American would make (.50 an hour vs $10), then the value of the jobs in American money is 2% (which might just be really close to reality).

     A lot in this article, but how about this: - (Arkadiy) - (7)
         Need to see his data - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
             Plus he's leaving out "quality" of employment. - (inthane-chan)
             More importantly... - (gdaustin)
             Re: Need to see his data - (neelk)
         Re: A lot in this article, but how about this: - (kmself) - (1)
             I've been doing those - (Arkadiy)
         Interesting point from Biden - (drewk)

At least as intelligible as your X-Man666.JPG monologues.
64 ms